Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden



Table 3. Out-migrants from various labour market “careers”. * = t-values significant at 5%-
level.

1991

1993

1996

1997

Employment_________

R2:

.74

R2:

.62

R2:

.67

R2:

.63

POP____________

*

-5.45

*

-3.48

*

-4.34

*

-4.66

EDHIGH_________

-.80

.23

-.62

-.53

EDLOW_________

.36

.49

-.33

.38

LOCTURN________

.41

-.07

.12

-.15

EMP____________

*

-3.84

-.58

.33

-1.33

AGE____________

*

5.73

*

2.82

.95

*

2.10

BRW___________

*

2.33

.48

1.51

*

2.60

INC_______________

2.83

*

2.09

*

4.63

*

3.14

KNOWINT_________

-.73

.82

-.51

-.39

INMIG_____________

*

4.07

*

2.81

*

3.09

*

3.74

Unemployment_______

R2:

.59

R2:

.67

R2:

.74

R2:

.77

POP____________

*

-2.33

*

-2.88

*

-3.59

*

-2.77

EDHIGH_________

-.84

-1.84

-.65

-.31

EDLOW_________

-.80

.48

-1.66

-1.06

LOCTURN________

-.64

.67

*

-2.45

-1.54

EMP____________

*

-4.40

*

-3.50

*

-3.49

*

-3.93

AGE____________

-1.24

-.48

*

-2.49

-1.65

BRW___________

1.19

1.61

*

2.26

.97

INC_______________

1.03

*

2.37

-1.28

-1.23

KNOWINT_________

-.079

-.58

-.73

-1.75

INMIG_____________

1.64

*

3.19

*

2.00

1.72

Studies_________________

R2:

.48

R2:

.37

R2:

.46

R2:

.46

POP____________

*

-5.60

*

-4.26

*

-4.09

*

-3.83

EDHIGH_________

*

3.18

1.22

*

2.04

*

2.17

EDLOW_________

-1.79

-1.84

*

-3.32

-1.86

LOCTURN________

-.21

*

-3.76

*

-3.20

*

-3.15

EMP____________

-.50

-.30

-1.27

*

-3.37

AGE____________

-1.40

*

2.54

1.85

.82

BRW___________

*

2.60

*

2.77

*

3.16

*

3.76

INC_______________

-.69

-1.41

*

-3.85

*

-1.95

KNOWINT_________

1.95

.96

1.08

1.13

INMIG_____________

-.89

1.08

1.68

*

3.41

’’Other”_________________

R2:

.50

R2:

.51

R2:

.51

R2:

.42

POP____________

-1.49

-.68

-.02

-.95

EDHIGH_________

-1.69

1.81

*

-3.50

.79

EDLOW_________

1.14

.90

-.22

.89

LOCTURN________

-.03

-1.71

*

-2.10

*

-2.31

EMP____________

-1.26

*

-2.05

*

-2.57

-1.35

AGE____________

.85

-.22

*

-2.35

-.43

BRW___________

.23

-.19

1.22

-.20

INC_______________

1.86

1.39

.88

-.49

KNOWINT_________

.14

1.62

1.32

-.63

INMIG_____________

1.49

*

2.42

*

5.60

1.22

Total___________________

R2:

.73

R2:

.67

R2:

.69

R2:

.71

POP____________

*

-5.41

*

-4.25

*

-4.98

*

-5.32

EDHIGH_________

-.49

-.23

-.52

.96

EDLOW_________

.17

-.10

*

-2.11

-.70

LOCTURN________

.09

-1.65

*

-2.32

*

-2.42

EMP____________

*

-3.49

-1.47

*

-2.05

*

-3.64

AGE____________

*

3.74

*

2.40

.89

1.39

BRW___________

*

2.10

1.32

*

2.68

*

3.10

INC_______________

*

2.55

1.52

1.13

.68

KNOWINT_________

-.07

1.25

.49

-.15

INMIG_____________

*

3.23

*

3.32

*

4.48

*

4.89

23



More intriguing information

1. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
2. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
3. Markets for Influence
4. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
5. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
6. The name is absent
7. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
8. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
9. Wirkung einer Feiertagsbereinigung des Länderfinanzausgleichs: eine empirische Analyse des deutschen Finanzausgleichs
10. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation