Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden



Table 3. Out-migrants from various labour market “careers”. * = t-values significant at 5%-
level.

1991

1993

1996

1997

Employment_________

R2:

.74

R2:

.62

R2:

.67

R2:

.63

POP____________

*

-5.45

*

-3.48

*

-4.34

*

-4.66

EDHIGH_________

-.80

.23

-.62

-.53

EDLOW_________

.36

.49

-.33

.38

LOCTURN________

.41

-.07

.12

-.15

EMP____________

*

-3.84

-.58

.33

-1.33

AGE____________

*

5.73

*

2.82

.95

*

2.10

BRW___________

*

2.33

.48

1.51

*

2.60

INC_______________

2.83

*

2.09

*

4.63

*

3.14

KNOWINT_________

-.73

.82

-.51

-.39

INMIG_____________

*

4.07

*

2.81

*

3.09

*

3.74

Unemployment_______

R2:

.59

R2:

.67

R2:

.74

R2:

.77

POP____________

*

-2.33

*

-2.88

*

-3.59

*

-2.77

EDHIGH_________

-.84

-1.84

-.65

-.31

EDLOW_________

-.80

.48

-1.66

-1.06

LOCTURN________

-.64

.67

*

-2.45

-1.54

EMP____________

*

-4.40

*

-3.50

*

-3.49

*

-3.93

AGE____________

-1.24

-.48

*

-2.49

-1.65

BRW___________

1.19

1.61

*

2.26

.97

INC_______________

1.03

*

2.37

-1.28

-1.23

KNOWINT_________

-.079

-.58

-.73

-1.75

INMIG_____________

1.64

*

3.19

*

2.00

1.72

Studies_________________

R2:

.48

R2:

.37

R2:

.46

R2:

.46

POP____________

*

-5.60

*

-4.26

*

-4.09

*

-3.83

EDHIGH_________

*

3.18

1.22

*

2.04

*

2.17

EDLOW_________

-1.79

-1.84

*

-3.32

-1.86

LOCTURN________

-.21

*

-3.76

*

-3.20

*

-3.15

EMP____________

-.50

-.30

-1.27

*

-3.37

AGE____________

-1.40

*

2.54

1.85

.82

BRW___________

*

2.60

*

2.77

*

3.16

*

3.76

INC_______________

-.69

-1.41

*

-3.85

*

-1.95

KNOWINT_________

1.95

.96

1.08

1.13

INMIG_____________

-.89

1.08

1.68

*

3.41

’’Other”_________________

R2:

.50

R2:

.51

R2:

.51

R2:

.42

POP____________

-1.49

-.68

-.02

-.95

EDHIGH_________

-1.69

1.81

*

-3.50

.79

EDLOW_________

1.14

.90

-.22

.89

LOCTURN________

-.03

-1.71

*

-2.10

*

-2.31

EMP____________

-1.26

*

-2.05

*

-2.57

-1.35

AGE____________

.85

-.22

*

-2.35

-.43

BRW___________

.23

-.19

1.22

-.20

INC_______________

1.86

1.39

.88

-.49

KNOWINT_________

.14

1.62

1.32

-.63

INMIG_____________

1.49

*

2.42

*

5.60

1.22

Total___________________

R2:

.73

R2:

.67

R2:

.69

R2:

.71

POP____________

*

-5.41

*

-4.25

*

-4.98

*

-5.32

EDHIGH_________

-.49

-.23

-.52

.96

EDLOW_________

.17

-.10

*

-2.11

-.70

LOCTURN________

.09

-1.65

*

-2.32

*

-2.42

EMP____________

*

-3.49

-1.47

*

-2.05

*

-3.64

AGE____________

*

3.74

*

2.40

.89

1.39

BRW___________

*

2.10

1.32

*

2.68

*

3.10

INC_______________

*

2.55

1.52

1.13

.68

KNOWINT_________

-.07

1.25

.49

-.15

INMIG_____________

*

3.23

*

3.32

*

4.48

*

4.89

23



More intriguing information

1. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
2. The name is absent
3. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
4. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
5. The name is absent
6. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
7. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
8. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
9. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
10. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
11. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
12. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
13. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
14. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
15. The name is absent
16. References
17. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
18. The name is absent
19. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
20. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning