Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden



Table 1. In-migrants from various labour market “careers”. * = t-values significant at 5%-
level.

1991

_______1993_______

________1996________

________1997________

Employment_______

R2:

________.72

R2:

_________.73

R2:

_________.75

R2:

________.59

POP____________

_________.32

*

-2.45

-1.29

-1.34

EDHIGH________

*

7.72

*

7.02

*

6.06

*

2.84

EDLOW________

*

3.11

1.90

*

3.82

_________.84

LOCTURN_______

_________.28

1.20

1.52

1.40

EMP___________

*

6.06

*

3.24

*

7.40

*

4.50

AGE___________

1.34

*

3.27

*

3.15

*

2.15

BRW__________

*

-3.54

-.75

-1.60

-.62

INC______________

*

-3.62

*

-3.92

-1.23

-1.22

KNOWINT_______

-1.71

*

-2.53

*

-2.94

-1.24

OUTMIG________

*

3.58

*

3.14

*

4.23

*

3.67

Unemployment_____

R2:

________.21

R2:

_________.57

R2:

_________.39

R2:

________.52

POP____________

_________.31

-.77

-1.56

_________.33

EDHIGH________

_________.35

*

2.89

*

2.05

-.18

EDLOW________

_________.65

-.49

__________.74

1.07

LOCTURN_______

_________.74

1.45

-1.00

_________.59

EMP___________

-1.17

-1.89

1.35

1.27

AGE___________

-1.02

__________.57

1.17

1.69

BRW__________

-.30

-1.60

-.24

*

-2.12

INC______________

-.76

*

-2.39

-1.10

________.27

KNOWINT_______

-.33

*

-2.25

-1.29

-.16

OUTMIG________

_________.84

__________.49

__________.76

*

3.12

Studies______________

R2:

________.48

R2:

_________.57

R2:

_________.72

R2:

________.74

POP____________

_________.41

-.57

1.01

_________.56

EDHIGH________

*

5.91

*

6.01

*

6.90

*

3.94

EDLOW________

-1.36

-1.32

__________-.26

*

-2.57

LOCTURN_______

_________.69

-.97

__________.46

-.16

EMP___________

_________.85

__________.76

1.85

1.04

AGE___________

1.82

*

3.97

*

4.32

*

6.20

BRW__________

-1.12

-.39

-1.54

-1.53

INC______________

*

-2.47

*

-2.31

*

-3.40

-1.70

KNOWINT_______

-3.05

-1.78

-1.19

-.80

OUTMIG________

1.74

__________.94

*

4.30

*

4.44

’’Other”______________

R2:

________.49

R2:

_________.66

R2:

_________.44

R2:

________.42

POP____________

_________.63

__________.87

-.45

-.48

EDHIGH________

*

3.46

*

4.11

1.95

1.69

EDLOW________

*

3.06

1.64

1.75

_________.32

LOCTURN_______

_________.06

__________.37

-.96

-.38

EMP___________

_________.85

*

-2.06

__________.29

*

2.67

AGE___________

-.03

__________.06

-.02

_________.29

BRW__________

-1.62

-1.34

-.18

-1.20

INC______________

*

-3.90

*

-6.87

*

-3.72

*

-3.43

KNOWINT_______

-.81

*

-3.80

*

-2.09

-1.54

OUTMIG________

_________.99

*

3.37

1.23

_________.48

Total________________

R2:

________.71

R2:

_________.73

R2:

_________.72

R2:

________.68

POP____________

_________.69

-1.19

-.62

-.29

EDHIGH________

*

8.13

*

8.69

*

7.25

*

3.86

EDLOW________

*

2.96

__________.59

*

2.62

-.17

LOCTURN_______

_________.42

__________.58

__________.60

1.00

EMP___________

*

4.67

1.21

*

4.47

*

3.76

AGE___________

1.33

*

3.90

*

4.06

*

4.63

BRW__________

*

-3.70

*

-2.02

*

-2.07

*

-2.46

INC______________

*

-4.59

*

-6.26

*

-3.94

*

2.43

KNOWINT_______

*

-2.05

*

-3.60

*

-3.14

-1.18

OUTMIG________

*

3.23

*

3.32

*

4.48

*

4.89

21



More intriguing information

1. The Interest Rate-Exchange Rate Link in the Mexican Float
2. The name is absent
3. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
4. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
5. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION
6. The name is absent
7. A model-free approach to delta hedging
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China