Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden



Table 2. In-migrants to various, labour market “careers”. * = t-values significant at 5%-level.

1991

________1993________

________1996________

________1997________

Employment_______

R2:

_______.72

R2:

_________.67

R2:

_________.69

R2:

_________.60

POP____________

________.13

*

-2.31

-1.73

-1.19

EDHIGH________

*

7.44

*

4.47

*

4.74

1.07

EDLOW________

*

3.66

*

3.06

*

3.11

1.01

LOCTURN_______

1.05

1.83

1.17

1.94

EMP___________

*

6.69

*

4.48

*

7.60

*

6.09

AGE___________

1.41

*

2.37

*

2.52

1.89

BRW__________

*

-2.94

__________.20

-.96

-.68

INC______________

*

-2.30

-1.18

1.24

1.71

KNOWINT_______

-1.49

-1.42

*

-2.96

-.38

OUTMIG________

*

4.34

*

3.46

*

2.76

*

3.71

Unemployment_____

R2:

_______.61

R2:

_________.63

R2:

_________.65

R2:

_________.57

POP____________

-.92

-.85

-1.95

-.40

EDHIGH________

*

3.81

*

3.17

*

2.27

-.38

EDLOW________

1.53

-.33

1.01

__________.50

LOCTURN_______

-.70

1.20

__________.72

-.08

EMP___________

-1.67

*

-2.48

1.54

1.05

AGE___________

-1.6

-.25

-1.28

-.42

BRW__________

-1.02

-1.18

-.24

-.57

INC______________

-1.89

*

-3.34

*

-2.74

*

-2.08

KNOWINT_______

*

-2.21

*

-2.71

-1.60

-1.69

OUTMIG________

-.40

1.06

__________.13

*

2.52

Studies______________

R2:

_______.53

R2:

_________.63

R2:

_________.70

R2:

__________.64

POP____________

1.79

__________.23

1.64

1.42

EDHIGH________

*

5.03

*

5.53

*

4.38

*

3.72

EDLOW________

-.57

-1.71

__________.61

-1.17

LOCTURN_______

-.01

*

-2.24

-.10

-.15

EMP___________

1.00

-1.41

-.52

-1.53

AGE___________

*

3.44

*

5.30

*

5.04

*

4.94

BRW__________

-1.71

-.69

-.86

-1.54

INC______________

*

-3.13

*

-3.36

*

-3.23

*

-3.23

KNOWINT_______

-1.02

-1.79

__________.16

-.87

OUTMIG________

*

3.13

1.42

*

4.82

*

3.51

’’Other”______________

R2:

_______.56

R2:

_________.71

R2:

_________.58

R2:

_________.50

POP____________

1.11

-.58

-.61

-.88

EDHIGH________

*

2.41

*

4.52

*

2.71

1.67

EDLOW________

*

2.90

1.30

*

2.05

__________.05

LOCTURN_______

-.31

__________.85

-1.45

-.94

EMP___________

1.72

-1.92

1.20

1.81

AGE___________

-.83

-.78

-.95

-.40

BRW__________

-1.92

-.50

-.34

-.86

INC______________

*

-4.53

*

-6.71

*

-4.99

*

-4.05

KNOWINT_______

-.91

*

-4.09

*

-2.31

-1.11

OUTMIG________

1.09

1.94

1.28

__________.15

Total________________

R2:

_______.71

R2:

_________.73

R2:

_________.72

R2:

_________.68

POP____________

________.68

-1.19

-.62

-.29

EDHIGH________

*

8.13

*

8.69

*

7.25

*

3.86

EDLOW________

*

2.96

__________.59

*

2.62

-.17

LOCTURN_______

________.42

__________.58

__________.60

1.00

EMP___________

*

4.67

1.21

*

4.47

*

3.76

AGE___________

1.33

*

3.90

*

4.06

*

4.63

BRW__________

*

-3.69

*

-2.02

*

-2.07

*

-2.46

INC______________

*

-4.58

*

-6.26

*

-3.94

*

2.43

KNOWINT_______

*

-2.05

*

-3.60

*

-3.14

-1.18

OUTMIG________

*

3.23

*

3.32

*

4.48

*

4.89

22



More intriguing information

1. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
2. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
6. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
7. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
8. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
9. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
10. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague