Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden



Table 2. In-migrants to various, labour market “careers”. * = t-values significant at 5%-level.

1991

________1993________

________1996________

________1997________

Employment_______

R2:

_______.72

R2:

_________.67

R2:

_________.69

R2:

_________.60

POP____________

________.13

*

-2.31

-1.73

-1.19

EDHIGH________

*

7.44

*

4.47

*

4.74

1.07

EDLOW________

*

3.66

*

3.06

*

3.11

1.01

LOCTURN_______

1.05

1.83

1.17

1.94

EMP___________

*

6.69

*

4.48

*

7.60

*

6.09

AGE___________

1.41

*

2.37

*

2.52

1.89

BRW__________

*

-2.94

__________.20

-.96

-.68

INC______________

*

-2.30

-1.18

1.24

1.71

KNOWINT_______

-1.49

-1.42

*

-2.96

-.38

OUTMIG________

*

4.34

*

3.46

*

2.76

*

3.71

Unemployment_____

R2:

_______.61

R2:

_________.63

R2:

_________.65

R2:

_________.57

POP____________

-.92

-.85

-1.95

-.40

EDHIGH________

*

3.81

*

3.17

*

2.27

-.38

EDLOW________

1.53

-.33

1.01

__________.50

LOCTURN_______

-.70

1.20

__________.72

-.08

EMP___________

-1.67

*

-2.48

1.54

1.05

AGE___________

-1.6

-.25

-1.28

-.42

BRW__________

-1.02

-1.18

-.24

-.57

INC______________

-1.89

*

-3.34

*

-2.74

*

-2.08

KNOWINT_______

*

-2.21

*

-2.71

-1.60

-1.69

OUTMIG________

-.40

1.06

__________.13

*

2.52

Studies______________

R2:

_______.53

R2:

_________.63

R2:

_________.70

R2:

__________.64

POP____________

1.79

__________.23

1.64

1.42

EDHIGH________

*

5.03

*

5.53

*

4.38

*

3.72

EDLOW________

-.57

-1.71

__________.61

-1.17

LOCTURN_______

-.01

*

-2.24

-.10

-.15

EMP___________

1.00

-1.41

-.52

-1.53

AGE___________

*

3.44

*

5.30

*

5.04

*

4.94

BRW__________

-1.71

-.69

-.86

-1.54

INC______________

*

-3.13

*

-3.36

*

-3.23

*

-3.23

KNOWINT_______

-1.02

-1.79

__________.16

-.87

OUTMIG________

*

3.13

1.42

*

4.82

*

3.51

’’Other”______________

R2:

_______.56

R2:

_________.71

R2:

_________.58

R2:

_________.50

POP____________

1.11

-.58

-.61

-.88

EDHIGH________

*

2.41

*

4.52

*

2.71

1.67

EDLOW________

*

2.90

1.30

*

2.05

__________.05

LOCTURN_______

-.31

__________.85

-1.45

-.94

EMP___________

1.72

-1.92

1.20

1.81

AGE___________

-.83

-.78

-.95

-.40

BRW__________

-1.92

-.50

-.34

-.86

INC______________

*

-4.53

*

-6.71

*

-4.99

*

-4.05

KNOWINT_______

-.91

*

-4.09

*

-2.31

-1.11

OUTMIG________

1.09

1.94

1.28

__________.15

Total________________

R2:

_______.71

R2:

_________.73

R2:

_________.72

R2:

_________.68

POP____________

________.68

-1.19

-.62

-.29

EDHIGH________

*

8.13

*

8.69

*

7.25

*

3.86

EDLOW________

*

2.96

__________.59

*

2.62

-.17

LOCTURN_______

________.42

__________.58

__________.60

1.00

EMP___________

*

4.67

1.21

*

4.47

*

3.76

AGE___________

1.33

*

3.90

*

4.06

*

4.63

BRW__________

*

-3.69

*

-2.02

*

-2.07

*

-2.46

INC______________

*

-4.58

*

-6.26

*

-3.94

*

2.43

KNOWINT_______

*

-2.05

*

-3.60

*

-3.14

-1.18

OUTMIG________

*

3.23

*

3.32

*

4.48

*

4.89

22



More intriguing information

1. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
2. The name is absent
3. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
4. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
5. The name is absent
6. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
7. The name is absent
8. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
9. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
10. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence