The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies



158

move toward increased accountability, the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted)
was established. Its inspection reports on schools were to be published both locally
and nationally, and together with the publication of ‘league tables’ of schools’
examination results to spotlight schools’ relative performance. Because of the vital
role of all this data in parental decisions over choice of schools, examination results
now were clearly linked with schools’ future survival. This new power of
examinations was translated into ever-increasing appeals over unsatisfactory results.
For the Boards this meant a major acceleration in the processing of appeals - an area
that had never before been more than a minor activity.

In 1996 Sir Ron Dearing, knighted for his achievement in reviewing the National
Curriculum and its assessment scheme for 5-16 year olds, was asked to turn his
attention to the post-16 age-group in his
Review of Qualifications for 16-19 Year Olds
(the Dearing Report). A critical assessment describes Dearing’s reports in general as
“...masterpieces of compromise, placating warring players rather than offering
visionary solutions...
” and his 16-19 Review as "couched almost entirely in terms of
employment needs - universities get an occasional mention, but beyond that, the
whole section is conceived in terms of workplace requirements'"
(Wolf 1998: 222).
Despite this focus, his report was to generate significant changes to qualifications, to
the regulators and to the examining boards. It designed the route which led to the
Guaranteeing Standards consultation in 1997, recommending changes to the
awarding bodies’ structure, and to
Qualifying for Success following the Labour
victory in 1997 which led to the redesign of A levels through
Curriculum 2000. All of
these will be considered in more detail later in the chapter, but the cumulative effect
of these policy documents on the examining boards was profound. They were the
means of
“an unprecedented centralization of education policy and administration in



More intriguing information

1. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
2. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
3. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
4. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
5. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
6. The name is absent
7. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
8. The name is absent
9. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
10. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
11. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung
12. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
13. An Attempt to 2
14. The name is absent
15. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
16. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
17. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
18. The name is absent
19. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
20. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll