159
England and Wales” with “ever-increasing regulation and oversight of the whole
examining process” (Wolf 2002a: 216) By 2000 the Boards were organisations whose
independence was at the very least severely limited if not illusory.
Now, in order to analyse how various aspects of these policies impacted upon the
Boards, the strands that comprise the whole fabric have to be pulled apart and
considered individually. I have categorized one group of these aspects as external and
stemming from factors beyond the Boards’control and a second group as internal and
affecting the organisational operations. The four external pressures I have identified
are:
Marketisation
Unification
Regulation
Standards
The three ‘internal’ pressures are of course related to the external factors:
Staffing problems
Upgrading information systems
Financial pressures
I maintain that the interaction of these issues had a destabilising effect on the
performance of the Boards which, because of their gradual loss of professional
independence, they were powerless to counteract.
More intriguing information
1. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY2. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
3. The name is absent
4. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
5. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
6. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
7. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
8. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent