The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies



188

The Cambridge ‘Brand’: A global fish that swallows minnows

In another part of the examining world, a very different series of take-overs had been
quietly taking place which were based not on competition but on control. The
University of Cambridge had never in its long history yielded control over any of its
constituent parts to any other body, and it was not about to begin with the minor
matter of its examining ‘business stream’.

The data in this section comes almost entirely from the interview I conducted with a
representative of what is now the OCR awarding body. While one would normally
research a variety of sources to achieve a balanced account, in the case of the
University of Cambridge this is not really an option. The complex and secretive
nature of its internal structures makes it virtually impossible for a researcher to gain
access to the decision-making processes that lie behind its operations. Therefore, I
found it both unexpected and illuminating when in the course of an interview the
subject broached of his own accord the series of takeovers Cambridge’s examining
arm - known since its Victorian birth as the University of Cambridge Local
Examinations Syndicate (UCLES)9 - has pursued in recent years.

When asked for his perspective on the examining boards in the 1990s, he felt that he
could better locate his recollections:

...a bit earlier than that. I first came to UCLES in 1985.... At that time there
were 22 exam boards ...and we were in the burgeoning Midland Exam Group,
and there were five of us: Southern Universities Joint Board (Bristol and
Southampton I think), Oxford & Cambridge
[Joint Board], Cambridge, West
Midlands and East Midlands
[CSE Boards]. Interesting Group, determined by
the Government. Cambridge was already talking to SUJB and ...within three or
four years...had absorbed SUJB. That was painless. Utterly and completely
painless. Not much of the SUJB to absorb, in truth: offices in Bristol - both
very classical examination boards, looked the same. SUJB was losing money,
the universities of the south didn’t want to carry on. So that was simple.
Relatively.



More intriguing information

1. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
2. The name is absent
3. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
4. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
5. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
6. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
7. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
11. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
12. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
13. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art
14. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]
15. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
16. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
17. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
18. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
19. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
20. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market