The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies



195

Department for Education and Employment. A QCA official expressed the view that

the Boards did have other options:

[The creation of current unitary authorities was] sort of stimulated on the one
hand by evolutionary pressures that arose from just review and reflection on the
examining system and how well it was working, but on the other hand
[by]
political pressures, with ministers having views about what might constitute an
appropriate number of awarding bodies. Then those two things coming together
in a fairly mysterious way to lead to the creation of the unitary bodies. And that
was interesting, because of course ministers have no power to tell the examining
boards to do this. They put pressure on, they encouraged them, they said,
“Patently, we think this is a good idea. ” I suppose there were implicit threats
that something unpleasant might happen if the boards didn ,t want to go that
way. But Tm not quite sure what they might have been, because had the boards
stood their ground and said, “Actually, no, we ,d rather do it this way, I guess
they could have done that. And it’s interesting to speculate what might have
happened had they chosen to do that.
(QCA2 2003)

However such a robust stance would have required the Boards to produce a
coordinated joint response, and as Edexcel had already been created and OCR was
taking shape, there was no chance of that option. Certainly both AEB and NEAB felt
that if they were to survive as organisations, they had to work out some means of
cooperation with City & Guilds, the only remaining GNVQ provider who could
enable them to retain accreditation as providers of English qualifications.

The long-drawn-out series of meetings and negotiations between AEB and NEAB
forms the central section of my September 2000 Masters Dissertation (Sturgis 2000)
and will not be rehearsed again here. In summary, in autumn 1997 the two Boards
formed a Joint Venture with City & Guilds entitled the Assessment and Qualifications
Alliance (AQA) Almost immediately City & Guilds withdrew. The other two then
bought out City & Guilds’ GNVQ provision, and following two years of negotiations,
in April 2000 officially merged the two parent bodies in AQA. Instead of pursuing the
detail of the entire process, I will focus on the observations of three different



More intriguing information

1. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
2. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
3. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
4. On the job rotation problem
5. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
6. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
7. European Integration: Some stylised facts
8. The name is absent
9. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
10. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
11. Social Irresponsibility in Management
12. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
13. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
18. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
19. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
20. The name is absent