The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies



201

Figure 4-3 Market Share by Board

A Level Percentage Market Shares by English Boards 1994-2000

Date

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

AQA (AEB+NEAB

51.10%

50.50%

49.20%

49.50%

48.80%

48%

48%

Edexcel

18.60%

18.80%

19.50%

19.40%

18.90%

19.20%

19.20%

OCR

23.40%

24.10%

25%

25.00%

26.40%

26.80%

26.80%

Total entries

732 974

730 415

740 470

777 710

790 035

787 734

772 005

(AQA 2000: 2)

3 Increasing Regulation: Accountabilityjustifies control

I will summarise briefly the previous stages in the regulation of the examining system
in order to emphasise the significance of the shift that took place during the 1990s.
From their creation in the 19th century, the examining boards had been independent
bodies accountable to their founding universities, until, to oversee the national system
of School Certificates, the Secondary Schools Examinations Council was established
in 1917 as an ‘arm’s length’ regulatory body.

When after the 1944 Act the Boards lost their places on the Secondary Schools
Examinations Council and were replaced by civil servants from the Ministry of
Education, it was clear to a later analyst that:

The distribution of power over the examination structure changed significantly
in the post-war years. The Minister, Ellen Wilkinson, clearly wanted more
control of examinations; George Tomlinson, her successor, continued this
policy....

(Lawton 1984: 97))



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Comparative study of hatching rates of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) eggs on different substrates
4. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
5. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
9. The name is absent
10. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.