The name is absent



Schedule I


584


Institution


Item 6
good
providers


mid-point


Item 27
don’t keep
jobs



Total   n = 91    n = 48

1.  n = 24    n = 21

2.  n = 10    n ≈ 9

5.  n = 17

6.  n = 3

8. n = 18    n = 18

9. n = 19

22.7    80.0     32.3

16.7     71.5     25.0

40.0    77,7     40.0

29.4              23.5

66.7              '0.0

5.6    88.9     38.9

26.3              36.8

6.0     45.2     14.0

9.5     S8.4     19.0

11.1     20.0     11.1

47.0

33.3

0.0     55.6     11.2

36.9

Missing observations = 2 (1)


Institution


Item 7
mother makes
rules


mid-point


Item 28
father makes
rules




Total


= 90


= 10


21


22.8

26.0


28.6


= 18

= 19


= 18


35.3

33.3

22.3

21.0


46.7

34.8

50.0

35.3

66.7

44.4


46.0


66.7


30.4

39.1

50.0


26.0


0.0

33.3

15.8


39.0


Missing


observations = 3


(1)


Institution


Item 8
don’t care for
possessions


mid-point


Item 29
care for
possessions

β,


Total   n = 91     n ≈ 48

1.  n = 24     n = 21

2.  n = 9      n = 9

5.  n = 17

6.  n = 4

8.  n = 18     n = 18

9.  n = 19

45.2     14.3     28.0

37.5     14.3     33.3

222     H. 1     44.4

52.9              17.6

25.0              25.0

55.6     16.7     16.7

52.7              31.6

12.2     26.8     73.4

4.8     29.2     81.0

22.2     33.3     66.7

29.5

50.0

16.7    27.8     66.7

15.8

Missing observations = 2 (1)



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
4. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
5. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
6. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
7. The name is absent
8. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
9. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
10. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK