The name is absent



404


APPENDIX В.


Hydae.

In Gloucesterscyre sunt................ 2400

In Wirecesterscyre sunt................ 1200

In Herefordescyre sunt................ 1500

In Warewycscyre sunt ................ 1200

In Oxenefordscyre sunt................ 2400

Iu Salopescyro sunt .................. 2300

In Cesterscyre sunt .................. 1300

In Staffordescyre sunt ................ 500

The Cotton MS. Vesp. A. xviii. fol. 112, b, Writtenin the reign
of Edward I., gives a different list of counties, among which the
following variations occur :—

Bedfordshire ................ 1000

Northamptonshire ............ 4200

Gloucestershire .............. 2000

Worcestershire .............. 1500

Shropshire .................. 2400

Cheshire .................... 1200

If we pursue the plan heretofore adopted, we shall have these
results:—

County.

Acreage.

Hidage.

H. at SO.

H. at 40.

Hxeesa
at 30.

Excess
at 40.

Batio
at 30.

Eatio
at 40.

Wilts..

868,060

4800

144.000

192,000

724,060

676,000

1 : 5

1 :3'5

Bedf'...

297,632

1200

36,000

48,000

261,632

249,632

1 : 7

1 :5

Camb..

536,313

2500

75,000

100,000

461,313

436,313

1 : 6

1 :4-5

Hunt..

242,250

800⅜

24,015

32,020

218,235

210,230

I : 9

1 :7

Nrbm.

646,810

3200

96,000

128,000

550,810

518,810

I : 5∙77

1 :4

Glouc..

790,470

2400

72,000

96,000

718,470

694,470

1 : 10

1 : 7-25

Wore..

459,710

1200

36,000

48,000

423,700

411,710

1 : 11-75

1 :8-5

Heref..

543,800

1500

45,000

60,000 ,502,800 483,800

1 : 11

1 :8

Warw.

567,930

1200

36,000

48,000

531,930

519,930

1 : 14∙75

1 : 10-75

Oxf....

467,230

2400

72,000

96,000

395,230’371,230

1 : 5∙5

1 :4

Salop..

864,360

2300

69,000

92,000

795,360

772.360

1 : 11∙5

1 :8-4

Chesh.

649,050

1300

39,000

52,000 610,050 597,050

1 : 15-62

1 : 11-5

Staff...

736,290

500

15,000

20,000

721,290

716,290

1 :48

1 :36'8

Now either these figures cannot be relied on, or we must carry
the hide in this calculation to a very different amount. If we
take it at 10∩ acres, we shall find the whole hidage of these thirteen
counties amounts to 25,300 × 100 or 2,530,000 acres, while the

THE HΓD.

495


Wholeactualacreagc is 7,669,905; giving an excess of 5,139,905,
and consequently a ratio of 25 : 51 nearly, or 1 : 2. This would
a little exceed the present ratio, which is 5:11, a result which
appears very improbable indeed in the reign of Henry HI. But
when we consider the numberless errors of transcription, so un-
avoidable where merely numbers, and not words, are given, and the
totally inconsistent accounts contained in different manuscripts,
we can hardly rest satisfied that the figures themselves arc trust-
worthy. Even on the hypothesis that in the time of Henry III.
or Edward I. the hide was calculated on the new footing of 100
acres, we yet could not reconcile the conflicting amounts assigned
to the counties themselves.



More intriguing information

1. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
2. The name is absent
3. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
4. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
5. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
6. EMU: some unanswered questions
7. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
8. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
9. The name is absent
10. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses