03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"



G-DAE Working Paper No. 03-01: “Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts”

Table 2. Distribution of Dividend Income by AGI Category, 2000 Tax Returns

AGI Category

Number of
Returns
(thousands)

Number of
Returns with
Dividends
(thousands)

Amount of
Dividends
($ millions)

Average
Dividend
Income per
Return

No AGI11

1,146

382

$1,576

$1,375

$1 under $5,000________

12,803

2,024

1,126

________88

$5,000 under $10,000

12,802

1,605

1,904

_______149

$10,000 under $15,000

12,111

1,623

2,667

220

$15,000 under $20,000

11,662

1,588

3,193

274

$20,000 under $25,000

9,993

1,417

2,492

249

$25,000 under $30,000

8,369

1,355

2,618

313

$30,000 under $40,000

13,547

2,927

5,391

398

$40,000 under $50,000

10,412

2,712

6,288

604

$50,000 under $75,000

17,076

6,303

14,572

853

$75,000 under $100,000

8,597

4,340

12,569

1,462

$100,000 under $200,000

8,083

5,430

26,866

3,324

$200,000 under $500,000

2,136

1,836

23,168

10,848

$500,000 under $1,000,000

396

368

11,465

28,943

$1,000,000 under $1,500,000

100

________95

5,163

51,882

$1,500,000 under $2,000,000

_______45

________43

3,489

78,266

$2,000,000 under $5,000,000

_______67

_____65

8,072

120,901

$5,000,000 under $10,000,000

18

17

4,694

266,578

$10,000,000 or more

_________11

__________11

9,673

862,542

TOTAL

129,374

34,141

$146,986

$1,136

To further explore the distribution of dividend income, we can plot the cumulative
proportion of tax returns, arranged from lowest to highest, against the cumulative
proportion of dividend income. This plot is similar to a Lorenz curve, commonly used to
illustrate inequality in the income distribution. 12 As seen in Figure 1, the plot displays a
high degree of curvature, indicating a significant level of inequality. The bottom half of
taxpayers received only about 10% of all dividend income. About 65% of all dividend
income accrued to the highest 10% of taxpayers while the top ½% of taxpayers received
about 30% of dividend income.

Similar to analyses of income distribution, one can calculate a Gini coefficient based on
the distribution of dividend income (see Appendix 1 for the details of calculating a Gini
coefficient). Approximate calculations indicate that the Gini coefficient for dividend

11 Includes individuals with zero or negative AGI. For example, a sole proprietor claiming a net loss could
have a negative AGI yet still claim positive dividend income.

12 Note that this plot is not exactly analogous to a Lorenz curve. A Lorenz curve plots the distribution of
income ordered by income. Figure 1 plots dividend income ordered by AGI, not ordered by dividend
income.



More intriguing information

1. European Integration: Some stylised facts
2. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
3. The name is absent
4. Valuing Farm Financial Information
5. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
6. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
7. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
8. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
9. The name is absent
10. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
11. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
12. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
13. The name is absent
14. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
15. The name is absent
16. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
17. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
18. The name is absent
19. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
20. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment