The name is absent



and, respectively,

t        t

-£ 5i-1αi

~b((at, bt, jt)) = <

i=1
t^

-£ 5i-1ai

<     i=1

+δtZβ if j (t + 1)= m

if j (t + 1)=0.


(2)


If for an infinite sequence of effort choices, a = (α12,...) and b = (b1,b2,...)
no terminal state is reached in finite time, payoffs are

∞                     ∞

KA((a, b, j)) = - X δt~1α>t and ~b((a, b, j)) = - X δt~‰

For a given behavior strategy profile σ = (aA,aB) each player’s payoff in the
tug-of-war can be derived from calculating the expected sum of discounted
per period payoffs generated by the probability distribution over histories in
the set
U∞Tτ U H. Moreover, for any t and ht Ht, one may define each
player’s expected discounted value of future per-period payoffs (discounted
back to time
t) conditional on the history ht by deriving the conditional
distribution induced by
σht over S=t+1 Tτ U H. We shall refer to this as
a player’s continuation value conditional on
ht and denote it by vi(σ ht) =
Eσht(Eis=tSs^t^A(as,j(s))). Note that this has netted out any expenditures
accrued on the history
ht.

Since the players’ objective functions are additively separable in the per-
period (time invariant) payoffs and transitions probabilities depend only upon
the current state and actions, continuation payoffs from any sequence of
current and future action profiles depend on past histories only through the
current state
j. It therefore seems natural to restrict attention to Markov
strategies that depend only on the current state
j and examine the set of
Markov perfect equilibria. Indeed, this partition of histories is that obtained
from the more formal analysis of the determination of the Markov partition in
Maskin and Tirole (2001). For any
t, we may partition past (non-terminal)
histories in
Ht by the period t state j(t), inducing a partition Ht(), and
define the collection of partitions,
H() {Ht()}=1. It can be demonstrated
that in our game the vector of collections
(Ha(∙),Hb()) = (H(),H())
is the unique maximally coarse consistent collection (the Markov collection
of partitions) in the sense of Maskin and Tirole (2001, p. 201). For any



More intriguing information

1. Globalization and the benefits of trade
2. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
3. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
4. EMU: some unanswered questions
5. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
6. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
7. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
8. The name is absent
9. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
10. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
11. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
12. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
13. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
14. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages