t = 1,2,3... a battle takes place between the players in which A (resp. B)
expends effort at (resp. bt). A victory by player A (B) in state i at time
t moves the war to state i — 1 (i + 1) at time t + 1. The state in period
t + 1 is therefore j (t + 1) = mA + nBt — nAt, where nAt and nBt denote
respectively, the number of battle victories that A and B have accumulated
by the end of period t. This continues as long as the war stays in some
interior state j ∈ Mmt ≡ {1,2,..., (m — 1)}. The war ends when one of
the players achieves final victory by driving the state to his favored terminal
state, j = 0 and j = m, for player A and B respectively. A prize (for final
victory) of size Za is awarded to A if the terminal state j = 0 is reached
and, alternatively, a prize of Zb is awarded to B if the terminal state j = m
is reached. Without loss of generality we assume that Za ≥ Zb. Figure 1
depicts the set of states.

φ states j
01
mA-1 mA mA+1
m-1 m
Figure 1:
Player A’s (B’s) period t payoff ^A(at,j(t)) (%b(bt,j(t))) is assumed to
equal Za (Zb) if player A (B) is awarded the prize in that period, and
—αt (—bt) if t is a period in which effort is expended.6 We assume that
each player maximizes the expected discounted sum of his per-period payoffs.
Throughout we assume that 0 < δ < 1 denotes the common, time invariant,
discount factor.7
The assumption that the cost of effort is simply measured by the effort
itself is for notational simplicity only. Since a player’s preference over income
streams is invariant with respect to a positive affine transformation of utility,
if player A (B) has a constant unit cost of effort ca (cb) we may normalize
utility by dividing by ca (cb) to obtain a new utility function representing
the same preferences in which the unit cost of effort is 1 but player A (B) has
6Since the per-period payoffs do not depend directly on time, we have dropped a time
index.
7It is straightforward to extend our results to cases in which players have different,
time invariant discount factors 5a and ⅛ .
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
3. The name is absent
4. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
5. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
6. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
7. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
8. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent