United States |
.73 |
$212.00 |
.34/$100 |
Cooperative learningl | |||
Israel |
1.40 |
$85.00 |
1.65/$100 |
Note:
a The effect size is the average score difference between treatment and control groups
divided by the standard deviation of the control group (Glass, McGaw & Smith, 1981).
b Efficiency is the effect size divided by the per-student cost.
c Source for Brazil: Armitage et al. (1986).
d Source: Jamison et al. for effect: Wells & Klees (1978) for cost
e Source: Heyneman et al. (1989) for effect: Searle (personal communication) for cost.
f Source: Lockheed et al. (1987)
g Source: Oxford et al. (1986) for effect: Kemmerer & Friend (1985) for cost.
h Source: Searle & Galda (1980) for effect: Wells & Klees (1978) for cost.
i Source: Friend et al. (1986) for effect: Galda (1985) for cost.
j Source: Psacharopoulos & Loxley (1985).
k Source: Levin et al. (1984).
l Source: Sharan & Shacher (1986).
DFID
Department for International Development
94 Victoria Street
London SW1E 5JL
[Previous Page] [Top of Page]
More intriguing information
1. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?2. Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model
3. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
7. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.
8. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
9. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
10. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?