An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers



Higher- and lower-income consumers are shown to have the same price sensitivity (-.94)
for salad vegetables, but descriptive statistics of Table 2 show lower-income consumers paying
prices that are statistically lower than those paid by higher-income consumers ($1.51 vs $1.33).
A similar pattern is shown for major vegetables. No statistical difference is shown in the own-
price elasticities of higher- and lower-income consumers, but lower-income consumers pay a
much lower price ($1.13 vs $1.61). These price differences show considerable selectivity in
purchase selections because lower-income consumers purchase a much higher percentage of
their total produce within this sub-category (34.5% vs 22.3%). Indeed large purchases of major
vegetables by lower-income consumers are what account for the disparity in overall fruit and
vegetable purchases for this group (58.8% vegetables vs 41.2% fruit). The fact that lower-
income consumers have own-price elasticities comparable to those of higher-income consumers
and yet pay much lower prices would suggest that the two groups actually purchase entirely
different bundles of commodities.

The own-price elasticity for Chinese vegetables is highly inelastic (-.43), but statistically
identical for both income groups. Identical elasticities for the second highest-priced sub-
category of vegetables are difficult to justify theoretically, but given the mix of vegetables within
this category, it is likely that consumers further segment this sub-category. That is, price
changes that influence the purchases of one group might be entirely irrelevant to another group.
Such scenario could explain how identical price elasticities for Chinese vegetables would result
in lower-income consumers paying an average of $1.04 less per pound for Chinese vegetables
(Table 2).

Lower-income consumers are shown to have larger own-price elasticities than higher-
income consumers for yellow vegetables and these differences are statistically significant (-1.66



More intriguing information

1. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
2. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
3. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
4. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
5. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
6. The name is absent
7. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement
8. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
9. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
10. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
11. The name is absent
12. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
13. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
14. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
15. The name is absent
16. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
17. Staying on the Dole
18. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
19. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
20. The name is absent