The name is absent

Table 3.12: Regional disaggregation of land values and sizes transferred in the commercial sector, 1990-93 ^a

Average size of transfer (ha)____________	Assign- ments	Sub- division	Deed of gift	Reserve lease	Right of occupancy	State lease	Sublease	Transfer	Deed of guarantee	Mortgage	Re-entry	Sur- render
Central	297.15	426.18	217.83	310.18	283.11	82.84	0.15	211.91	1396.09	588.35	294.93	164.50
Copperbelt	9.58	0.67	2.54	310.84	300.52	19.94	0.19	118.40	5.98	255.13	42.86	160.59
Eastern	18.09	12.64	0.76	93.67	151.04	15.93	18.00	89.16	0.00	164.63	407.35	15.56
Luapula	7.70	0.00	0.08	0.00	181.98	7.14	0.00	16.82	250.00	296.37	0.21	156.60
Lusaka	12.58	7.41	7.43	390.23	622.94	11.12	0.27	11.32	7.08	40.27	35.25	85.01
Northern	51.66	0.00	0.00	251.19	208.38	25.45	0.00	71.28	0.00	136.32	136.03	95.50
North-Western	0.58	0.00	0.02	0.00	292.42	2.93	0.00	0.79	0.00	16.46	0.00	0.97
Southern	203.57	222.96	344.84	919.89	173.03	67.64	586.59	160.70	0.00	568.31	42.15	202.64
Western	78.18	0.00	0.00	131.00	57.18	5.47	0.00	30.04	0.00	20.13	0.22	0.23
Average land				Average
value/price	Assign-	Sub-		land	Assign-	Sub-
(K,000/ha)	ments	division	Transfer	value/price	ments	division	Transfer
				(K000/ha)
Central	6.57	0.13	0.04	Northern	19.94	0.00	0.11
Copperbelt	193.78	912.91	0.21	North- Western	1997.83	0.00	0.00
Eastern	59.62	31.46	0.01	Southern	5.48	4.18	0.03
Luapula	38.71	0.00	0.20	Western	3.28	0.00	0.00
Lusaka	251.28	62.66	5.04

a. Data was only available through July of 1993. Average size of transfer was calculated by summing the number of transfers in each category across 1990-93 and summing the number
of hectares across the same period and dividing. Average value was calculated in the same manner.

110

CorPapers

The name is absent

More intriguing information