224
Table 7.16: Zambia price indexes (1985 = 100)
|
Year |
High income CPI |
Low income CPI |
Agriculture |
Building |
Fixed capital |
|
1962 |
10.90 |
9.20 | |||
|
1963 |
11.10 |
9.20 | |||
|
1964 |
11.50 |
9.50 | |||
|
1965 |
12.00 |
10.20 | |||
|
1966 |
12.60 |
11.30 | |||
|
1967 |
13.30 |
11.80 |
11.50 |
5.90 | |
|
1968 |
14.40 |
13.10 |
11.80 |
6.00 | |
|
1969 |
15.10 |
13.40 |
12.40 |
6.10 | |
|
1970 |
15.90 |
13.80 |
12.50 |
6.20 | |
|
1971 |
16.70 |
14.60 |
13.00 |
6.80 | |
|
1972 |
17.60 |
15.40 |
13.70 |
7.40 | |
|
1973 |
18.90 |
16.40 |
14.30 |
7.90 | |
|
1974 |
20.60 |
17.70 |
15.30 |
9.00 | |
|
1975 |
22.40 |
19.50 |
17.60 |
21.40 |
10.90 |
|
1976 |
26.00 |
23.10 |
18.30 |
25.80 |
14.50 |
|
1977 |
30.60 |
27.70 |
21.10 |
29.10 |
18.30 |
|
1978 |
34.20 |
32.30 |
24.10 |
34.00 |
23.70 |
|
1979 |
38.00 |
35.40 |
27.00 |
38.90 |
27.90 |
|
1980 |
42.40 |
39.50 |
32.40 |
42.30 |
31.20 |
|
1981 |
46.80 |
45.10 |
44.90 |
47.50 |
34.30 |
|
1982 |
53.00 |
50.70 |
50.90 |
55.40 |
39.40 |
|
1983 |
62.40 |
60.60 |
63.00 |
63.40 |
48.70 |
|
1984 |
75.30 |
72.80 |
68.50 |
70.40 |
69.90 |
|
1985 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|
1986 |
160.10 |
154.00 |
166.90 |
148.40 |
283.30 |
|
1987 |
250.30 |
224.30 |
201.30 |
237.00 |
601.50 |
|
1988 |
375.80 |
346.90 |
271.20 |
300.50 |
486.10 |
|
1989 |
847.00 |
793.50 |
582.10 |
864.40 |
764.70 |
|
1990 |
1,695.20 |
1,674.40 |
1,124.30 |
2,062.90 |
1,963.80 |
Source: Derived from Zambia CSO data.
More intriguing information
1. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET2. The name is absent
3. Wage mobility, Job mobility and Spatial mobility in the Portuguese economy
4. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
5. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
9. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
10. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment