The name is absent



82

Table 3.2: Percentage of total farm unit cultivated, 1987-88

Commercial farms

All farms (MAFF series)

Total
farming
area
1987-88

(ha)

Cultivated
land
1987-88
(ha)

Percent
cultivated

(%)

Reported
arable
land
1987-88
_________(ha)

Cultivated
land
1987-88
(ha)

Percent
cultivated
(%)

Central

453,279

59,924

13.2

150,194.2

114,387.0

76.2

Copperbelt'

311,506

59,763

19.2

59,395.6

41,590.5

70.0

Eastern

314,138.1

273,692.2

87.1

Luapula

90,701.3

56,369.5

62.1

Lusaka

265,739

30,079

11.3

36,340.1

29,838.8

82.1

Northern

279,200.3

177,302.6

63.5

North-Western

55,347.5

26,585.1

48.0

Southern

601,228

23,136

3.8

185,663.0

160,893.9

86.7

Western

117,017.5

93,779.1

80.1

Zambia total

1,631,752

172,902

10.6

1,287,997.6

974,438.5

75.7

a. For the commercial farms, Copperbelt province figures include all other provinces except for those separately
listed. This is the case for every year except 1990.

Source: Commercial Farm Series Data, 1987-88.

Rates of utilization in the MAFF survey are much higher at 75.7 percent nationwide, but range
from a low of 48.0 percent in North-Western province to a high of 87.1 percent in Eastern province.
Allowing for grazing uses and land left idle for waste, site of homestead, natural forest, and public
infrastructure, these figures suggest a fairly high rate of utilization by small farms which dominate the
MAFF sampling frame. But conclusions hinge on the definition of "reported arable land," for which
data provided by respondents are guesses, not estimates taken from area surveys. Furthermore, farms
that are completely underutilized, as indicated in chapter 1, may very well be due to absentee
landlords who are impossible to locate at the time of the survey.

The extent of farm utilization is also linked with farm size, as indicated in table 3.3. Land
utilization in the smallest farm size category (0-79 hectares) is 35.1 percent of the total farming area.
Rates of land utilization decline with further increases in farm size: 20.5 percent for the 80-199
hectare category, 8.1 percent in the 200-399 hectare category, 14.4 percent in the 400-799 hectare
category, 12.3 percent in the 800-1,999 hectare category, and
8.8 percent on farms 2,000 hectares
and above.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
3. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
4. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
5. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
6. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
7. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
8. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
9. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
10. The name is absent
11. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
15. The name is absent
16. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
17. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
18. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
19. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
20. The name is absent