The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula



Acknowledgement

We are grateful for the financial support by the foundations “Stiftung Goldener Zuckerhut” and the “H.
Wilhelm Schaumann Stiftung” (both Germany) and by the State Government of Schleswig-Holstein,
Germany. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors.

References

1. FAO/WHO (2004), Enterobacter sakazakii and other microorganisms in powdered infant
formula: meeting report, Microbiological Risk Assessment Series, No. 6. Available at:
www.who.int/foodsafety/ publications/micro/enterobacter_sakazakii/en/

2. Kramer, M.S., and Kakuma, R. (2002), The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding - A
systematic review. Available at:
www.who.int/nut/documents/optimal_duration_of_exc_
bfeeding _review_eng.pdf

3. Butte, N.F., Lopez-Alarcon, M.G., and Garza, C. (2002), Nutrient adequacy of exclusive
breastfeeding for the term infant during the first six months of life. Available at:
www.who.int/nut/documents/ nut_adequacy_of_exc_bfeeding_eng.pdf

4. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2004), Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Biological
Hazards on the request from the Commission related to the microbiological risks in infant
formulae and follow-on formulae. EFSA Journal, 113, pp. 1-35. Available at:
www.efsa.eu.int/science/biohaz/ biohaz_opinions/ 691_en.html

5. Lehner, A., and Stephan, R. (2004), Microbiological, epidemiological and food safety aspects of
Enterobacter sakazakii
. Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 67 (12), pp. 2850-2857.

6. WHO (2004), Questions and Answers on Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered infant formula.
Version 4, 13 February 2004. Available at:
www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/
en/qa2.pdf

7. Lai, K.K. (2001), Enterobacter sakazakii Infections among Neonates, Infants, Children, and
Adults - Case Reports and a Review of the Literature. Medicine, Vol. 80 (2), pp. 113-122.

8. Sethi, S.P., and Bhalla, B.A. (1993), A New Perspective on the International Social Regulation
of Business: An Evaluation of the Compliance Status of the International Code of Marketing of
Breast-Milk Substitutes. Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 141-158.

9. Greer, T.V. (1990), International Infant Formula Marketing: The Debate Continues. Advances in
International Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 207-225.

10. WHO (1981), International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes. Available at:
www.who.int/nutrition/publications/code_english.pdf

11. Ellsberg, D. (1961), Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Vol. 75 (4), pp. 643-669.

12. Camerer, C., and Weber, M. (1992), Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences Uncertainty
and Ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5 (4), pp. 325-370.

11



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
3. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Brauchen wir ein Konjunkturprogramm?: Kommentar
12. The name is absent
13. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
17. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
18. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
19. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
20. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution