Figure 1: Regions of determinacy under a current-looking domestic price inflation rule
Case III is relevant for any a < 0.471615 and condition (ii) of (32) is always satisfied.16
Thus from condition (i) of (32) first-order indeterminacy can arise provided the inflation
coefficient μ is sufficiently low. It is straightforward to show that this lower bound on μ
is decreasing with respect to a:
∂(32)(i) = - 4αΛ2(2 - Λ2)(l+ β) < 0
∂a [(1 - 2a)α(2 - Λ2) - Λ2]2
and thus as the degree of trade openness is reduced, the higher the inflation coefficient
that is required to prevent indeterminacy.
3.2.2 Consumer Price Inflation
If consumer price inflation is the policy indicator, then the set of linearized conditions for
cross-country differences yields the five-dimensional system of the form:
15Note that this threshold level for a is independent of the degree of price stickiness (ψ). Furthermore it is
remarkably robust to variations in α and λ. For example setting λ = 4 requires a < 0.467 whereas setting
α = 0.25 requires a < 0.459.
16Given the benchmark values for β and δ, condition (ii) of (32) is always satisfied for any a ≤ 0.47 provided
α > 0.295.
16
More intriguing information
1. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern2. EU enlargement and environmental policy
3. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
4. The name is absent
5. LABOR POLICY AND THE OVER-ALL ECONOMY
6. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
7. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
8. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households
9. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
10. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets