Figure 1: Regions of determinacy under a current-looking domestic price inflation rule
Case III is relevant for any a < 0.471615 and condition (ii) of (32) is always satisfied.16
Thus from condition (i) of (32) first-order indeterminacy can arise provided the inflation
coefficient μ is sufficiently low. It is straightforward to show that this lower bound on μ
is decreasing with respect to a:
∂(32)(i) = - 4αΛ2(2 - Λ2)(l+ β) < 0
∂a [(1 - 2a)α(2 - Λ2) - Λ2]2
and thus as the degree of trade openness is reduced, the higher the inflation coefficient
that is required to prevent indeterminacy.
3.2.2 Consumer Price Inflation
If consumer price inflation is the policy indicator, then the set of linearized conditions for
cross-country differences yields the five-dimensional system of the form:
15Note that this threshold level for a is independent of the degree of price stickiness (ψ). Furthermore it is
remarkably robust to variations in α and λ. For example setting λ = 4 requires a < 0.467 whereas setting
α = 0.25 requires a < 0.459.
16Given the benchmark values for β and δ, condition (ii) of (32) is always satisfied for any a ≤ 0.47 provided
α > 0.295.
16
More intriguing information
1. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know2. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
3. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
4. Constructing the Phylomemetic Tree Case of Study: Indonesian Tradition-Inspired Buildings
5. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
6. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
7. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach