The name is absent



Table 2: Tabulation of School Enrollment Transitions (Before and After Fostering Episode) Comparing Foster Children, Host
Siblings, and Biological Siblings (Column Percent)

School Enrollment Transitions

Column %

_(N)_______________________________________________

(1)

Host Siblings

(2)
Foster

(3)

Children Biological Siblings

Never enrolled (Not enrolled before, Not enrolled after)

60.5

82.7

77.9

(204)

(167)

(468)

Discontinued Enrollment (Enrolled before, Not enrolled after) 3.3

2.0

2.3

(11)

(4)

(14)

Newly Enrolled (Not enrolled before, Enrolled after)

4.5

4.9

4.5

(15)

(10)

(27)

Enrolled both years (Enrolled before, Enrolled after)

31.7

10.4

15.3

(107)

(21)

_____________(92)________________

Observations

337

202

601

Testing for equality of all 3 columns:

LR χ2 (6) = 51.00

p-value=0.00

Testing for equality of columns 1 & 2:

LR χ2 (3) = 37.11

p-value=0.00

Testing for equality of columns 1 & 3:

LR χ2 (3) = 36.22

p-value=0.00

Testing for equality of columns 2 & 3:___________________

LR χ2 (3) = 3.36

p-value=0.34_________________

Note: I restrict the table to households that fostered in 1999 and 2000 because of the need for enrollment information prior to the
fostering episode. There are 244 host siblings, 108 foster children, and 310 biological siblings that were fostered in 1998 that are
excluded from the table. All results also exclude children under age 5. There were 59 host siblings, 6 foster children, and 83 biological
siblings under age 5 in the year prior to fostering who were also excluded from the regressions. For households fostering in 1999, I
consider 1998 enrollment as prior enrollment and 1999 enrollment as after. Results are similar if instead I focus on households involved
in fostering in 1998 and 1999 and, for households fostering in 1998 use 1998 enrollment as before and 1999 enrollment as after. Testing
for the equality of all 3 columns yields a LR χ2 (6) test statistic of 51.00 with the corresponding p-value of 0.00. Testing for the equality
of columns 1 and 2 yields a LR χ2 (3) test statistic of 37.11 with a p-value of 0.00. Testing for the equality of columns 1 and 3 yields a LR
χ2 (3) test statistic of 36.22 with a p-value of 0.00. Finally, testing for the equality of columns 2 and 3 yields a LR χ2 (3) test statistic of
3.36 with a p-value equal to 0.34. Data source: Author’s survey.

28



More intriguing information

1. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
2. The name is absent
3. Locke's theory of perception
4. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Markets for Influence
8. Education as a Moral Concept
9. The name is absent
10. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
11. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
12. The name is absent
13. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
14. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
15. The name is absent
16. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
17. The name is absent
18. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
19. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
20. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003