Table 4: Household Fixed Effects Estimation Comparing School Enrollment of Foster Children with Host Siblings and
Foster Children with Biological Siblings
Panel A: Foster Children Compared to Host Siblings |
(2) |
(3) |
Panel B: Foster Children Compared to Biological Siblings | |||
(1) |
_____________________(4) |
(5) |
(6)______________ | |||
Ever Fostered * After Fostering |
0.015 |
-0.007 |
-0.037 |
0.036 |
0.016 |
0.026 |
[0.029] |
[0.035] |
[0.049] |
[0.026] |
[0.031] |
[0.043] | |
Ever Fostered |
-0.196*** |
-0.183*** |
-0.243*** |
-0.074*** |
-0.046 |
-0.077* |
[0.027] |
[0.035] |
[0.048] |
[0.022] |
[0.028] |
[0.040] | |
Male |
0.028* |
0.027 |
0.025 |
0.099*** |
0.106*** |
0.102*** |
[0.016] |
[0.018] |
[0.017] |
[0.012] |
[0.014] |
[0.013] | |
(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Male |
0.061 |
0.056 | ||||
[0.056] |
[0.051] | |||||
Ever Fostered * Male |
-0.036 |
-0.076* | ||||
[0.056] |
[0.046] | |||||
(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Young |
0.184** |
0.127* | ||||
[0.074] |
[0.066] | |||||
(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Middle |
0.100 |
-0.020 | ||||
[0.065] |
[0.057] | |||||
Ever Fostered * Young |
0.195*** |
0.064 | ||||
[0.068] |
[0.057] | |||||
Ever Fostered * Middle |
-0.019 |
-0.004 | ||||
[0.062] |
[0.053] | |||||
Young |
-0.138*** |
-0.086*** | ||||
[0.023] |
[0.017] | |||||
Middle |
0.131*** |
0.121*** | ||||
[0.021] |
[0.016] | |||||
Year = 1999 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.003 |
-0.000 |
-0.000 |
-0.001 |
[0.017] |
[0.017] |
[0.017] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] | |
Year = 2000 |
0.032* |
0.032* |
0.019 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
0.011 |
[0.018] |
[0.018] |
[0.018] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] | |
Constant |
0.168*** |
0.169*** |
0.293*** |
0.037* |
0.034* |
0.128*** |
[0.028] |
[0.028] |
[0.021] |
[0.020] |
[0.020] |
[0.017] | |
Controls for Age Effects? a________________ |
Yes______ |
Yes______ |
Yes______ |
______________Yes_______ |
Yes_______ |
Yes_________ |
Observations____________________________ |
2682 |
2682 |
2682 |
________________3632 |
3632 |
3632________ |
Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The dependent variable is school enrollment with a mean of 26.4 in
Panel A and 19.0 in Panel B. All households that fostered a child in 1998, 1999, or 2000 are included in the regressions. The dataset in Panel A consists of 640 host
siblings and 316 foster children measured over 3 years. The dataset in Panel B consists of 994 biological siblings and 316 foster children measured over 3 years. In Panel
A, I exclude 186 observations in which the child is under age 5 in a given year, and in Panel B, I exclude 298 observations for the same reason. For columns 3 and 6, the
omitted age category is children over age 12. Young children are aged 5, 6, or 7. Middle children are aged 8 to 11. Data source: Author’s survey.
a For columns 1, 2, 4, and 5, I include dummy variables for each age, but in columns 3 and 6, for ease of presentation, I interact the age categories young and middle
with (Ever Fostered*After Fostering) and with Ever Fostered. Results are qualitatively similar if I instead interact age dummies with those variables.
30
More intriguing information
1. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters2. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
6. The name is absent
7. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
8. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
9. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
10. Unemployment in an Interdependent World