The name is absent



Table 4: Household Fixed Effects Estimation Comparing School Enrollment of Foster Children with Host Siblings and
Foster Children with Biological Siblings

Panel A: Foster Children Compared to Host Siblings

(2)

(3)

Panel B: Foster Children Compared to Biological Siblings

(1)

_____________________(4)

(5)

(6)______________

Ever Fostered * After Fostering

0.015

-0.007

-0.037

0.036

0.016

0.026

[0.029]

[0.035]

[0.049]

[0.026]

[0.031]

[0.043]

Ever Fostered

-0.196***

-0.183***

-0.243***

-0.074***

-0.046

-0.077*

[0.027]

[0.035]

[0.048]

[0.022]

[0.028]

[0.040]

Male

0.028*

0.027

0.025

0.099***

0.106***

0.102***

[0.016]

[0.018]

[0.017]

[0.012]

[0.014]

[0.013]

(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Male

0.061

0.056

[0.056]

[0.051]

Ever Fostered * Male

-0.036

-0.076*

[0.056]

[0.046]

(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Young

0.184**

0.127*

[0.074]

[0.066]

(Ever Fostered*After Fostering)*Middle

0.100

-0.020

[0.065]

[0.057]

Ever Fostered * Young

0.195***

0.064

[0.068]

[0.057]

Ever Fostered * Middle

-0.019

-0.004

[0.062]

[0.053]

Young

-0.138***

-0.086***

[0.023]

[0.017]

Middle

0.131***

0.121***

[0.021]

[0.016]

Year = 1999

0.008

0.008

0.003

-0.000

-0.000

-0.001

[0.017]

[0.017]

[0.017]

[0.014]

[0.014]

[0.014]

Year = 2000

0.032*

0.032*

0.019

0.011

0.011

0.011

[0.018]

[0.018]

[0.018]

[0.014]

[0.014]

[0.014]

Constant

0.168***

0.169***

0.293***

0.037*

0.034*

0.128***

[0.028]

[0.028]

[0.021]

[0.020]

[0.020]

[0.017]

Controls for Age Effects? a________________

Yes______

Yes______

Yes______

______________Yes_______

Yes_______

Yes_________

Observations____________________________

2682

2682

2682

________________3632

3632

3632________

Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The dependent variable is school enrollment with a mean of 26.4 in
Panel A and 19.0 in Panel B. All households that fostered a child in 1998, 1999, or 2000 are included in the regressions. The dataset in Panel A consists of 640 host
siblings and 316 foster children measured over 3 years. The dataset in Panel B consists of 994 biological siblings and 316 foster children measured over 3 years. In Panel
A, I exclude 186 observations in which the child is under age 5 in a given year, and in Panel B, I exclude 298 observations for the same reason. For columns 3 and 6, the
omitted age category is children over age 12. Young children are aged 5, 6, or 7. Middle children are aged 8 to 11. Data source: Author’s survey.

a For columns 1, 2, 4, and 5, I include dummy variables for each age, but in columns 3 and 6, for ease of presentation, I interact the age categories young and middle
with (Ever Fostered*After Fostering) and with Ever Fostered. Results are qualitatively similar if I instead interact age dummies with those variables.

30



More intriguing information

1. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
2. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
3. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
4. The name is absent
5. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
6. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
7. The name is absent
8. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent