Table 7: Overview for Children of Non-Fostering Households
|
Panel A: Summary Statistics |
Panel B: School Enrollment Transitions (1999-2000) | ||
|
(1) Children of Non- Fostering Households |
(2) Children of Non- _____________________________________________________________Fostering Households | ||
|
Enrollment Rate (% currently enrolled) |
18.3 |
Never enrolled (Not enrolled 1999, Not enrolled 2000) |
[Column %] |
|
Average Age |
9.4 |
Discontinued Enrollment (Enrolled1999, Not enrolled 2000) |
2.8 |
|
Median Age |
9 |
Newly Enrolled (Not enrolled 1999, Enrolled 2000) |
6.1 |
|
Percentage Male |
50.9 |
Enrolled both years (Enrolled 1999, Enrolled 2000) |
14.7 |
|
Number of Children |
^^470 |
Number of Children |
^^423 |
Panel C: Difference in Differences Comparing Average School Enrollment a
|
Foster Children (N=202) |
Children of Non- Fostering Households ____________(N=423) |
Difference | |
|
Pre-Fostering |
0.124 |
0.175 |
-0.051 |
|
[0.023] |
[0.018] |
[0.032] | |
|
Post-Fostering |
0.154 |
0.208 |
-0.054 |
|
[0.025] |
[0.020] |
[0.034] | |
|
Difference |
0.030 |
0.033 |
-0.003 |
|
[0.034] |
[0.026] |
[0.046] |
Note: Statistics in the table are based on children aged 5 years and older. Panel A contains summary statistics, similar to Table 1, for the children
of non-fostering households, and Panel B contains school enrollment transition information, similar to Table 2, for these children. In Panel B, I
use 1999 and 2000 enrollment rates for these children, but results are similar using 1998 and 1999 enrollment rates. In Panel B, I exclude 47
children aged 4 in 1999 because they are too young to be enrolled. Data source: Author’s survey.
a Panel C presents difference in differences results comparing average school enrollment for foster children with children from non-fostering
households using pre and post-fostering enrollment for the foster children and 1999 and 2000 enrollment for the other children, with similar results
using 1998 and 1999 enrollment for these other children.
33
More intriguing information
1. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM2. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
6. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
7. Who runs the IFIs?
8. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
9. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
10. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping