The name is absent



Table 8: Household and Child Fixed Effects Regressions Comparing Host Siblings, Biological Siblings, Foster Children and Children

____________________________________________From Non-Fostering Households____________________________________________

Dependent Variable:
School Enrollment

Child Fixed Effects

Household Fixed Effects

(1)

All
Children

(2)

Children

Aged 5-7

(3)
Children

Aged 8-11

(4)

Children

Aged>=12

(5)

All
Children

(6)

Children

Aged 5-7

(7)
Children

Aged 8-11

(8)

Children

Aged>=12

Host* After

0.019

0.239***

0.023

-0.094***

-0.004

-0.045

0.005

-0.036

[0.014]

[0.043]

[0.024]

[0.019]

[0.021]

[0.035]

[0.035]

[0.034]

Biological*After

0.012

0.113***

0.041**

-0.054***

-0.006

-0.009

0.062**

-0.058**

[0.011]

[0.028]

[0.018]

[0.015]

[0.016]

[0.026]

[0.028]

[0.027]

Foster*After

0.011

0.215***

-0.056*

-0.015

0.041

0.182***

0.011

0.002

[0.018]

[0.056]

[0.031]

[0.024]

[0.027]

[0.050]

[0.045]

[0.043]

Host Sibling

0.196***

0.118**

0.181***

0.254***

[0.028]

[0.047]

[0.049]

[0.050]

Biological Sibling

0.081***

0.003

0.045

0.137***

[0.025]

[0.043]

[0.044]

[0.046]

Male

0.081***

0.047***

0.122***

0.089***

[0.010]

[0.018]

[0.018]

[0.018]

Year = 1999

-0.001

0.055

0.019

-0.035

-0.003

-0.036

0.045

-0.039

[0.015]

[0.034]

[0.024]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.036]

[0.043]

[0.046]

Year = 2000

0.023

0.195***

-0.025

-0.059**

0.016

0.058

0.004

-0.072

[0.015]

[0.038]

[0.027]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.037]

[0.043]

[0.044]

Constant

0.231***

0.018

0.310***

0.247***

0.076***

0.066**

0.172***

0.061*

[0.013]

[0.013]

[0.009]

[0.008]_________

[0.020]

[0.030]

[0.032]

[0.034]

Observations

6656

1998

2449

2209

6656

1998

2449

2209

Number of children

2420

1074

1222

952

Number of households

489

445

420________

393________

Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. Dataset includes 640 host siblings, 994
biological siblings, 316 foster children, and 470 non-fostering household children measured over 3 years with the reference group being children
from non-fostering households. Columns 1 and 5 exclude 604 observations in which the children were under age 5 in a given year. To control for
age effects in columns 1 and 5, I also include dummy variables indicating if the child is young or middle aged. In the age restricted columns, I run
the same child or household fixed effects regression but the dataset is restricted to include children of that age range. The year dummies are
interacted with an indicator variable for children from non-fostering households to capture the control group’s time trend. Data source: Author’s
survey.

34



More intriguing information

1. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
2. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
3. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
4. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
5. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
6. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
7. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996
8. Economies of Size for Conventional Tillage and No-till Wheat Production
9. The name is absent
10. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7