The name is absent



Table 8: Household and Child Fixed Effects Regressions Comparing Host Siblings, Biological Siblings, Foster Children and Children

____________________________________________From Non-Fostering Households____________________________________________

Dependent Variable:
School Enrollment

Child Fixed Effects

Household Fixed Effects

(1)

All
Children

(2)

Children

Aged 5-7

(3)
Children

Aged 8-11

(4)

Children

Aged>=12

(5)

All
Children

(6)

Children

Aged 5-7

(7)
Children

Aged 8-11

(8)

Children

Aged>=12

Host* After

0.019

0.239***

0.023

-0.094***

-0.004

-0.045

0.005

-0.036

[0.014]

[0.043]

[0.024]

[0.019]

[0.021]

[0.035]

[0.035]

[0.034]

Biological*After

0.012

0.113***

0.041**

-0.054***

-0.006

-0.009

0.062**

-0.058**

[0.011]

[0.028]

[0.018]

[0.015]

[0.016]

[0.026]

[0.028]

[0.027]

Foster*After

0.011

0.215***

-0.056*

-0.015

0.041

0.182***

0.011

0.002

[0.018]

[0.056]

[0.031]

[0.024]

[0.027]

[0.050]

[0.045]

[0.043]

Host Sibling

0.196***

0.118**

0.181***

0.254***

[0.028]

[0.047]

[0.049]

[0.050]

Biological Sibling

0.081***

0.003

0.045

0.137***

[0.025]

[0.043]

[0.044]

[0.046]

Male

0.081***

0.047***

0.122***

0.089***

[0.010]

[0.018]

[0.018]

[0.018]

Year = 1999

-0.001

0.055

0.019

-0.035

-0.003

-0.036

0.045

-0.039

[0.015]

[0.034]

[0.024]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.036]

[0.043]

[0.046]

Year = 2000

0.023

0.195***

-0.025

-0.059**

0.016

0.058

0.004

-0.072

[0.015]

[0.038]

[0.027]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.037]

[0.043]

[0.044]

Constant

0.231***

0.018

0.310***

0.247***

0.076***

0.066**

0.172***

0.061*

[0.013]

[0.013]

[0.009]

[0.008]_________

[0.020]

[0.030]

[0.032]

[0.034]

Observations

6656

1998

2449

2209

6656

1998

2449

2209

Number of children

2420

1074

1222

952

Number of households

489

445

420________

393________

Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. Dataset includes 640 host siblings, 994
biological siblings, 316 foster children, and 470 non-fostering household children measured over 3 years with the reference group being children
from non-fostering households. Columns 1 and 5 exclude 604 observations in which the children were under age 5 in a given year. To control for
age effects in columns 1 and 5, I also include dummy variables indicating if the child is young or middle aged. In the age restricted columns, I run
the same child or household fixed effects regression but the dataset is restricted to include children of that age range. The year dummies are
interacted with an indicator variable for children from non-fostering households to capture the control group’s time trend. Data source: Author’s
survey.

34



More intriguing information

1. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
2. The name is absent
3. The Evolution
4. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
8. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
12. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
13. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
14. The name is absent
15. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
16. The name is absent
17. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
18. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
19. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
20. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification