The name is absent



Table 8: Household and Child Fixed Effects Regressions Comparing Host Siblings, Biological Siblings, Foster Children and Children

____________________________________________From Non-Fostering Households____________________________________________

Dependent Variable:
School Enrollment

Child Fixed Effects

Household Fixed Effects

(1)

All
Children

(2)

Children

Aged 5-7

(3)
Children

Aged 8-11

(4)

Children

Aged>=12

(5)

All
Children

(6)

Children

Aged 5-7

(7)
Children

Aged 8-11

(8)

Children

Aged>=12

Host* After

0.019

0.239***

0.023

-0.094***

-0.004

-0.045

0.005

-0.036

[0.014]

[0.043]

[0.024]

[0.019]

[0.021]

[0.035]

[0.035]

[0.034]

Biological*After

0.012

0.113***

0.041**

-0.054***

-0.006

-0.009

0.062**

-0.058**

[0.011]

[0.028]

[0.018]

[0.015]

[0.016]

[0.026]

[0.028]

[0.027]

Foster*After

0.011

0.215***

-0.056*

-0.015

0.041

0.182***

0.011

0.002

[0.018]

[0.056]

[0.031]

[0.024]

[0.027]

[0.050]

[0.045]

[0.043]

Host Sibling

0.196***

0.118**

0.181***

0.254***

[0.028]

[0.047]

[0.049]

[0.050]

Biological Sibling

0.081***

0.003

0.045

0.137***

[0.025]

[0.043]

[0.044]

[0.046]

Male

0.081***

0.047***

0.122***

0.089***

[0.010]

[0.018]

[0.018]

[0.018]

Year = 1999

-0.001

0.055

0.019

-0.035

-0.003

-0.036

0.045

-0.039

[0.015]

[0.034]

[0.024]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.036]

[0.043]

[0.046]

Year = 2000

0.023

0.195***

-0.025

-0.059**

0.016

0.058

0.004

-0.072

[0.015]

[0.038]

[0.027]

[0.023]

[0.025]

[0.037]

[0.043]

[0.044]

Constant

0.231***

0.018

0.310***

0.247***

0.076***

0.066**

0.172***

0.061*

[0.013]

[0.013]

[0.009]

[0.008]_________

[0.020]

[0.030]

[0.032]

[0.034]

Observations

6656

1998

2449

2209

6656

1998

2449

2209

Number of children

2420

1074

1222

952

Number of households

489

445

420________

393________

Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. Dataset includes 640 host siblings, 994
biological siblings, 316 foster children, and 470 non-fostering household children measured over 3 years with the reference group being children
from non-fostering households. Columns 1 and 5 exclude 604 observations in which the children were under age 5 in a given year. To control for
age effects in columns 1 and 5, I also include dummy variables indicating if the child is young or middle aged. In the age restricted columns, I run
the same child or household fixed effects regression but the dataset is restricted to include children of that age range. The year dummies are
interacted with an indicator variable for children from non-fostering households to capture the control group’s time trend. Data source: Author’s
survey.

34



More intriguing information

1. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
2. The name is absent
3. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
4. The name is absent
5. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
9. The name is absent
10. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi