Appendix Table 1: Household Fixed Effects Estimation Comparing Host Siblings and Biological Siblings
(1) All Households |
(2) All Households |
(3) All Households |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) Only Households |
(8) | |
Biological Sibling *After |
-0.018 |
-0.042* |
-0.041 |
0.027 |
-0.021 |
-0.160** |
-0.003 |
-0.084* |
[0.020] |
[0.025] |
[0.032] |
[0.108] |
[0.025] |
[0.076] |
[0.037] |
[0.050] | |
Biological Sibling |
-0.117*** |
-0.151*** |
-0.106*** |
-0.233** |
-0.154*** |
0.058 |
-0.237*** |
-0.202*** |
[0.020] |
[0.027] |
[0.032] |
[0.103] |
[0.026] |
[0.075] |
[0.039] |
[0.052] | |
Male |
0.073*** |
0.021 |
0.076*** |
0.046 |
0.065*** |
0.195*** |
0.058** |
0.146*** |
[0.012] |
[0.019] |
[0.012] |
[0.045] |
[0.016] |
[0.041] |
[0.023] |
[0.033] | |
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
0.046 | |||||||
Male |
[0.030] | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Male |
0.055* | |||||||
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
-0.022 | |||||||
Young |
[0.039] | |||||||
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
0.085** | |||||||
Middle |
[0.038] | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Young |
0.054 | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Middle |
-0.072* | |||||||
Year = 1999 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
0.006 |
0.029 |
0.011 |
0.040 |
0.009 |
0.026 |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.050] |
[0.019] |
[0.049] |
[0.028] |
[0.037] | |
Year = 2000 |
0.034** |
0.035** |
0.024 |
0.071 |
0.023 |
0.162*** |
0.043 |
0.029 |
[0.016] |
[0.016] |
[0.016] |
[0.050] |
[0.022] |
[0.055] |
[0.033] |
[0.045] | |
Constant |
0.104*** |
0.136*** |
0.253*** |
0.224*** |
0.147*** |
-0.115 |
0.177*** |
0.130** |
[0.022] |
[0.024] |
[0.020] |
[0.078] |
[0.030] |
[0.075] |
[0.041] |
[0.060] | |
Controls for Age Effects? a |
Yes_______ |
Yes_______ |
Yes_______ |
Yes________ |
Yes________ |
Yes________ |
Yes___________ |
Yes_________ |
Observations |
4458 |
4458 |
4458 |
387 |
2566 |
352 |
1374 |
632 |
Number of households_____ |
309_______ |
309_______ |
309_______ |
29__________ |
190__________ |
23___________ |
101______________ |
57___________ |
Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The regressions include all households that fostered a child in 1998, 1999,
or 2000. The household fixed effect is for the joint sender-receiver paired household. The dataset consists of 640 host siblings and 994 biological siblings measured over 3
years. All regressions exclude children under age 5. There are 444 observations where the child is under age 5 in a given year that were excluded from the regressions. In
column 3, the omitted age category is children over age 12. Young children are aged 5, 6, or 7. Middle children are aged 8 to 11. Data source: Author’s survey.
a All regressions include dummy variables for each age, except column 3, in which for ease of presentation, I include dummy variables indicating the age categories young
and middle. Results are qualitatively similar if I instead use age dummies.
37
More intriguing information
1. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
5. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
6. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
7. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
8. The name is absent
9. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES