The name is absent

Appendix Table 1: Household Fixed Effects Estimation Comparing Host Siblings and Biological Siblings

	(1) All Households	(2) All Households	(3) All Households	(4) Only Households Fostering for Schooling Reasons_____	(5) Only Households Fostering for Child Labor Reasons_____	(6) Only Households Fostering due to Parent Death_______	(7) Only Households Fostering To & From Cote d’Ivoire / Ouagadougou	(8) Only Households Fostering Within Same Village_______
Biological Sibling *After	-0.018	-0.042*	-0.041	0.027	-0.021	-0.160**	-0.003	-0.084*
	[0.020]	[0.025]	[0.032]	[0.108]	[0.025]	[0.076]	[0.037]	[0.050]
Biological Sibling	-0.117***	-0.151***	-0.106***	-0.233**	-0.154***	0.058	-0.237***	-0.202***
	[0.020]	[0.027]	[0.032]	[0.103]	[0.026]	[0.075]	[0.039]	[0.052]
Male	0.073***	0.021	0.076***	0.046	0.065***	0.195***	0.058**	0.146***
	[0.012]	[0.019]	[0.012]	[0.045]	[0.016]	[0.041]	[0.023]	[0.033]
(Biological SiblingAfter)		0.046
Male		[0.030]
Biological Sibling * Male		0.055* [0.032]
(Biological SiblingAfter)			-0.022
Young			[0.039]
(Biological SiblingAfter)			0.085**
Middle			[0.038]
Biological Sibling * Young			0.054 [0.041]
Biological Sibling * Middle			-0.072* [0.039]
Year = 1999	0.013	0.013	0.006	0.029	0.011	0.040	0.009	0.026
	[0.014]	[0.014]	[0.014]	[0.050]	[0.019]	[0.049]	[0.028]	[0.037]
Year = 2000	0.034**	0.035**	0.024	0.071	0.023	0.162***	0.043	0.029
	[0.016]	[0.016]	[0.016]	[0.050]	[0.022]	[0.055]	[0.033]	[0.045]
Constant	0.104***	0.136***	0.253***	0.224***	0.147***	-0.115	0.177***	0.130**
	[0.022]	[0.024]	[0.020]	[0.078]	[0.030]	[0.075]	[0.041]	[0.060]
Controls for Age Effects? ^a	Yes_______	Yes_______	Yes_______	Yes________	Yes________	Yes________	Yes___________	Yes_________
Observations	4458	4458	4458	387	2566	352	1374	632
Number of households_____	309_______	309_______	309_______	29__________	190__________	23___________	101______________	57___________

Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The regressions include all households that fostered a child in 1998, 1999,
or 2000. The household fixed effect is for the joint sender-receiver paired household. The dataset consists of 640 host siblings and 994 biological siblings measured over 3
years. All regressions exclude children under age 5. There are 444 observations where the child is under age 5 in a given year that were excluded from the regressions. In
column 3, the omitted age category is children over age 12. Young children are aged 5, 6, or 7. Middle children are aged 8 to 11. Data source: Author’s survey.

^a All regressions include dummy variables for each age, except column 3, in which for ease of presentation, I include dummy variables indicating the age categories young
and middle. Results are qualitatively similar if I instead use age dummies.

More intriguing information

1. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
2. Comparative study of hatching rates of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) eggs on different substrates
3. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
4. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
5. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests
6. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
7. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
8. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
9. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
10. The name is absent