Appendix Table 1: Household Fixed Effects Estimation Comparing Host Siblings and Biological Siblings
(1) All Households |
(2) All Households |
(3) All Households |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) Only Households |
(8) | |
Biological Sibling *After |
-0.018 |
-0.042* |
-0.041 |
0.027 |
-0.021 |
-0.160** |
-0.003 |
-0.084* |
[0.020] |
[0.025] |
[0.032] |
[0.108] |
[0.025] |
[0.076] |
[0.037] |
[0.050] | |
Biological Sibling |
-0.117*** |
-0.151*** |
-0.106*** |
-0.233** |
-0.154*** |
0.058 |
-0.237*** |
-0.202*** |
[0.020] |
[0.027] |
[0.032] |
[0.103] |
[0.026] |
[0.075] |
[0.039] |
[0.052] | |
Male |
0.073*** |
0.021 |
0.076*** |
0.046 |
0.065*** |
0.195*** |
0.058** |
0.146*** |
[0.012] |
[0.019] |
[0.012] |
[0.045] |
[0.016] |
[0.041] |
[0.023] |
[0.033] | |
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
0.046 | |||||||
Male |
[0.030] | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Male |
0.055* | |||||||
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
-0.022 | |||||||
Young |
[0.039] | |||||||
(Biological Sibling*After)* |
0.085** | |||||||
Middle |
[0.038] | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Young |
0.054 | |||||||
Biological Sibling * Middle |
-0.072* | |||||||
Year = 1999 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
0.006 |
0.029 |
0.011 |
0.040 |
0.009 |
0.026 |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.014] |
[0.050] |
[0.019] |
[0.049] |
[0.028] |
[0.037] | |
Year = 2000 |
0.034** |
0.035** |
0.024 |
0.071 |
0.023 |
0.162*** |
0.043 |
0.029 |
[0.016] |
[0.016] |
[0.016] |
[0.050] |
[0.022] |
[0.055] |
[0.033] |
[0.045] | |
Constant |
0.104*** |
0.136*** |
0.253*** |
0.224*** |
0.147*** |
-0.115 |
0.177*** |
0.130** |
[0.022] |
[0.024] |
[0.020] |
[0.078] |
[0.030] |
[0.075] |
[0.041] |
[0.060] | |
Controls for Age Effects? a |
Yes_______ |
Yes_______ |
Yes_______ |
Yes________ |
Yes________ |
Yes________ |
Yes___________ |
Yes_________ |
Observations |
4458 |
4458 |
4458 |
387 |
2566 |
352 |
1374 |
632 |
Number of households_____ |
309_______ |
309_______ |
309_______ |
29__________ |
190__________ |
23___________ |
101______________ |
57___________ |
Note: Standard errors in brackets. *, **, *** indicate significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The regressions include all households that fostered a child in 1998, 1999,
or 2000. The household fixed effect is for the joint sender-receiver paired household. The dataset consists of 640 host siblings and 994 biological siblings measured over 3
years. All regressions exclude children under age 5. There are 444 observations where the child is under age 5 in a given year that were excluded from the regressions. In
column 3, the omitted age category is children over age 12. Young children are aged 5, 6, or 7. Middle children are aged 8 to 11. Data source: Author’s survey.
a All regressions include dummy variables for each age, except column 3, in which for ease of presentation, I include dummy variables indicating the age categories young
and middle. Results are qualitatively similar if I instead use age dummies.
37
More intriguing information
1. EU enlargement and environmental policy2. Text of a letter
3. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
4. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
5. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
9. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
10. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study