The name is absent



Table 3: Difference in Differences Comparing Average School Enrollment for Foster Children with
Host Siblings and Biological Siblings

Panel A:

Foster Children

_________(N=202)

Host Siblings

_______(N=337)

Difference

Pre-Fostering

0.124

[0.023]

0.350

[0.026]

-0.226

[0.039]

Post-Fostering

0.154

[0.025]

0.362

[0.026]

-0.208

[0.039]

Difference

0.030

[0.034]

0.012

[0.033]

0.018

[0.055]

Panel B:

Foster Children

_________(N=202)

Biological Siblings

__________(N=601)

Difference

Pre-Fostering

0.124

[0.023]

0.176

[0.016]

-0.052

[0.031]

Post-Fostering

0.154

[0.025]

0.198

[0.016]

-0.044

[0.032]

Difference

0.030

[0.034]

0.022

[0.022]

0.008

[0.044]

Note: Standard errors in brackets. I restrict the table to only households involved in
fostering in 1999 and 2000 because of the need for enrollment information prior to the
fostering episode. For households fostering in 1999, I consider 1998 enrollment as pre-
fostering enrollment and 1999 enrollment as post-fostering. For households fostering in
2000, 1999 is pre-fostering enrollment and 2000 is post-fostering enrollment. Results
are similar if instead I exclude the children fostered in 2000 and use enrollment in the
year of fostering as pre-fostering enrollment and post-fostering enrollment is the
following year. Only children 5 years and older are included in this table. Data source:
Author’s survey.

29



More intriguing information

1. Iconic memory or icon?
2. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
3. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
4. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
5. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
6. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
7. The name is absent
8. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
9. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
10. Direct observations of the kinetics of migrating T-cells suggest active retention by endothelial cells with continual bidirectional migration