Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines



Table 3: Impact on household decision makring

Sample: Women whose spouses/partners are living in the same house

Dependent Variable:

What to buy
in market

Expensive
purchases

Number of
children

Family
planning

Assist family
members

Personal use

Recreation

Family
purchase

Schooling for
children

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Ordered

Specification:

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

Probit

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Panel A: Female

Treatment

-0.004

0.203*

0.217*

0.023

0.143

0.013

0.112

0.174

0.162

Marketing

(0.117)

-0.026

(0.109)
0.060

(0.114)

0.139

(0.110)

-0.117

(0.113)

0.046

(0.118)

-0.124

(0.107)

0.062

(0.111)
0.115

(0.125)

0.220

Constant

(0.134)

(0.128)

(0.137)

(0.131)

(0.125)

(0.137)

(0.120)

(0.138)

(0.151)

Observations
R-squared

641

642

639

641

642

643

642

641

609

Panel B: Females with household decision making power below median in baseline

Treatment

-0.005

0.409**

0.175

0.010

0.323**

0.243

0.229

0.237

-0.065

Marketing

(0.162)

-0.154

(0.162)

0.148

(0.164)
0.165

(0.162)

-0.192

(0.158)

0.316*

(0.167)

-0.238

(0.152)

0.282*

(0.164)

0.150

(0.199)

-0.123

Constant

(0.182)

(0.181)

(0.182)

(0.187)

(0.174)

(0.183)

(0.171)

(0.191)

(0.228)

Observations
R-squared

320

321

321

321

321

322

321

320

306

Panel C: Females with household decision making power above median in baseline

Treatment

0.005

0.037

0.297*

0.033

-0.002

-0.222

0.022

0.136

0.328*

Marketing

(0.171)

0.169

(0.148)
0.020

(0.159)
0.178

(0.151)

-0.048

(0.160)

-0.174

(0.170)
0.130

(0.152)

-0.143

(0.155)
0.127

(0.168)

0.509**

Constant

(0.205)

(0.184)

(0.207)

(0.186)

(0.179)

(0.213)

(0.169)

(0.197)

(0.210)

` Observations
R-squared___________

321

321

318

320

321

321

321

321

303

Robust standard errors in parentheses, * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%. All regressions in this table control for the initial household
decision making power in the baseline. The value for each item takes zero if the decision making is done by husband, one if the decision making is done by the
couple, and two if decision making is done by wife.



More intriguing information

1. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
2. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
3. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
4. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
5. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
9. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
10. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
11. The name is absent
12. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
13. The name is absent
14. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
15. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
16. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
17. The name is absent
18. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
19. The name is absent
20. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7