Table 2b: Impact on Aggregate Household Decision-making Power, by gender
Sample: Individuals who have children and whose spouses/partners live in the same household
|
__________________Female__________________ |
_________________Male__________________ | |||||||
|
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (3) |
(factor) |
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (factor) | ||||
|
Level (1) |
Change |
Level |
Change |
Level |
Change | |||
|
Panel A: Household decision making power below median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.089*** |
0.094** |
0.291*** |
0.341*** |
0.018 |
0.021 |
0.041 |
0.025 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.039) |
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
(0.036) |
(0.047) |
(0.102) |
(0.115) | |
|
Marketing |
0.023 |
0.061 |
0.123 |
0.223* |
0.051 |
0.075 |
0.133 |
0.132 |
|
(0.040) |
(0.050) |
(0.117) |
(0.131) |
(0.040) |
(0.051) |
(0.117) |
(0.128) | |
|
Constant |
0.800*** |
0.075** |
-0.124 |
0.233*** |
0.751*** |
0.105*** |
-0.128 |
0.296*** |
|
(0.068) |
(0.030) |
(0.090) |
(0.080) |
(0.056) |
(0.037) |
(0.101) |
(0.095) | |
|
Observations |
322 |
322 |
303 |
303 |
296 |
296 |
284 |
284 |
|
R-squared |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
|
Panel B: Household decision making power above median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.026 |
0.022 |
0.111 |
0.109 |
-0.027 |
0.015 |
-0.061 |
-0.004 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.037) |
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
(0.049) |
(0.058) |
(0.137) |
(0.149) | |
|
Marketing |
0.027 |
0.019 |
0.068 |
0.045 |
-0.030 |
0.027 |
-0.092 |
-0.027 |
|
(0.037) |
(0.048) |
(0.120) |
(0.137) |
(0.053) |
(0.062) |
(0.145) |
(0.157) | |
|
Constant |
0.879*** |
-0.342*** |
0.115 |
-0.380*** |
0.954*** |
-0.440*** |
0.123 |
-0.579*** |
|
(0.103) |
(0.027) |
(0.096) |
(0.078) |
(0.137) |
(0.047) |
(0.139) |
(0.122) | |
|
Observations |
321 |
321 |
297 |
297 |
245 |
245 |
230 |
230 |
|
R-squared |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses, * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%. Dependent
Variable: Index of household decision making power on what to buy at the market, expensive purchases, giving
assistance to family members, family purchases, recreational use of the money, personal use of the money, number of
children, schooling of children, and use of family planning. The value for each item takes zero if the decision making is
done by spouse, one if the decision making is done by the couple, and two if decision making is done by the respondent.
See notes under Table 1 for the exact definition of each index. Regressions in columns (1) and (3) control for the
household decision making power in the baseline (August 2003).
More intriguing information
1. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES2. The name is absent
3. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
7. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
8. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
9. The name is absent
10. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival