Table 2b: Impact on Aggregate Household Decision-making Power, by gender
Sample: Individuals who have children and whose spouses/partners live in the same household
|
__________________Female__________________ |
_________________Male__________________ | |||||||
|
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (3) |
(factor) |
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (factor) | ||||
|
Level (1) |
Change |
Level |
Change |
Level |
Change | |||
|
Panel A: Household decision making power below median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.089*** |
0.094** |
0.291*** |
0.341*** |
0.018 |
0.021 |
0.041 |
0.025 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.039) |
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
(0.036) |
(0.047) |
(0.102) |
(0.115) | |
|
Marketing |
0.023 |
0.061 |
0.123 |
0.223* |
0.051 |
0.075 |
0.133 |
0.132 |
|
(0.040) |
(0.050) |
(0.117) |
(0.131) |
(0.040) |
(0.051) |
(0.117) |
(0.128) | |
|
Constant |
0.800*** |
0.075** |
-0.124 |
0.233*** |
0.751*** |
0.105*** |
-0.128 |
0.296*** |
|
(0.068) |
(0.030) |
(0.090) |
(0.080) |
(0.056) |
(0.037) |
(0.101) |
(0.095) | |
|
Observations |
322 |
322 |
303 |
303 |
296 |
296 |
284 |
284 |
|
R-squared |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
|
Panel B: Household decision making power above median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.026 |
0.022 |
0.111 |
0.109 |
-0.027 |
0.015 |
-0.061 |
-0.004 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.037) |
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
(0.049) |
(0.058) |
(0.137) |
(0.149) | |
|
Marketing |
0.027 |
0.019 |
0.068 |
0.045 |
-0.030 |
0.027 |
-0.092 |
-0.027 |
|
(0.037) |
(0.048) |
(0.120) |
(0.137) |
(0.053) |
(0.062) |
(0.145) |
(0.157) | |
|
Constant |
0.879*** |
-0.342*** |
0.115 |
-0.380*** |
0.954*** |
-0.440*** |
0.123 |
-0.579*** |
|
(0.103) |
(0.027) |
(0.096) |
(0.078) |
(0.137) |
(0.047) |
(0.139) |
(0.122) | |
|
Observations |
321 |
321 |
297 |
297 |
245 |
245 |
230 |
230 |
|
R-squared |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses, * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%. Dependent
Variable: Index of household decision making power on what to buy at the market, expensive purchases, giving
assistance to family members, family purchases, recreational use of the money, personal use of the money, number of
children, schooling of children, and use of family planning. The value for each item takes zero if the decision making is
done by spouse, one if the decision making is done by the couple, and two if decision making is done by the respondent.
See notes under Table 1 for the exact definition of each index. Regressions in columns (1) and (3) control for the
household decision making power in the baseline (August 2003).
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
3. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
4. The name is absent
5. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
6. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
7. The name is absent
8. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
9. The name is absent
10. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures