Table 2b: Impact on Aggregate Household Decision-making Power, by gender
Sample: Individuals who have children and whose spouses/partners live in the same household
|
__________________Female__________________ |
_________________Male__________________ | |||||||
|
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (3) |
(factor) |
Index 1 (mean) |
Index 2 (factor) | ||||
|
Level (1) |
Change |
Level |
Change |
Level |
Change | |||
|
Panel A: Household decision making power below median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.089*** |
0.094** |
0.291*** |
0.341*** |
0.018 |
0.021 |
0.041 |
0.025 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.039) |
(0.097) |
(0.102) |
(0.036) |
(0.047) |
(0.102) |
(0.115) | |
|
Marketing |
0.023 |
0.061 |
0.123 |
0.223* |
0.051 |
0.075 |
0.133 |
0.132 |
|
(0.040) |
(0.050) |
(0.117) |
(0.131) |
(0.040) |
(0.051) |
(0.117) |
(0.128) | |
|
Constant |
0.800*** |
0.075** |
-0.124 |
0.233*** |
0.751*** |
0.105*** |
-0.128 |
0.296*** |
|
(0.068) |
(0.030) |
(0.090) |
(0.080) |
(0.056) |
(0.037) |
(0.101) |
(0.095) | |
|
Observations |
322 |
322 |
303 |
303 |
296 |
296 |
284 |
284 |
|
R-squared |
0.08 |
0.02 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
|
Panel B: Household decision making power above median in baseline | ||||||||
|
Treatment |
0.026 |
0.022 |
0.111 |
0.109 |
-0.027 |
0.015 |
-0.061 |
-0.004 |
|
(0.032) |
(0.037) |
(0.098) |
(0.103) |
(0.049) |
(0.058) |
(0.137) |
(0.149) | |
|
Marketing |
0.027 |
0.019 |
0.068 |
0.045 |
-0.030 |
0.027 |
-0.092 |
-0.027 |
|
(0.037) |
(0.048) |
(0.120) |
(0.137) |
(0.053) |
(0.062) |
(0.145) |
(0.157) | |
|
Constant |
0.879*** |
-0.342*** |
0.115 |
-0.380*** |
0.954*** |
-0.440*** |
0.123 |
-0.579*** |
|
(0.103) |
(0.027) |
(0.096) |
(0.078) |
(0.137) |
(0.047) |
(0.139) |
(0.122) | |
|
Observations |
321 |
321 |
297 |
297 |
245 |
245 |
230 |
230 |
|
R-squared |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses, * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%. Dependent
Variable: Index of household decision making power on what to buy at the market, expensive purchases, giving
assistance to family members, family purchases, recreational use of the money, personal use of the money, number of
children, schooling of children, and use of family planning. The value for each item takes zero if the decision making is
done by spouse, one if the decision making is done by the couple, and two if decision making is done by the respondent.
See notes under Table 1 for the exact definition of each index. Regressions in columns (1) and (3) control for the
household decision making power in the baseline (August 2003).
More intriguing information
1. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
5. The name is absent
6. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
7. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
8. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
9. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
10. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland