For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments



7 Conclusion

We have developed a model that gives a rational to both the desirability of
MAI and the observed problems in its implementation. We have shown that the
externalities arising from the FDI-redirection effects of MAI might explain the
failure to implement MAI and the emergency of coordination failures that give
rise to multiple equilibria. We have also shown that after the implementation of
MAI some countries (either MAI members or outsiders) could lose. This might
explain why we have recently seen some countries strongly opposing the mere
proposal of MAI.

Our model is highly stylized. However, the main message is likely to remain
unchanged in a framework where MNEs decide upon their locations taking into
account countries’ market size, factor prices, or trade barriers. We expect in-
stead that a more sophisticated representation of the process of MAI implemen-
tation may affect our conclusions. Future work should check the robustness of
our results when, for instance, MNEs are engaged in active lobbying, or when
countries weigh differently the welfare of different agents when deciding about
MAI membership.

21



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
4. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
5. The name is absent
6. Sector Switching: An Unexplored Dimension of Firm Dynamics in Developing Countries
7. The name is absent
8. The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union
9. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
10. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001