For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments



7 Conclusion

We have developed a model that gives a rational to both the desirability of
MAI and the observed problems in its implementation. We have shown that the
externalities arising from the FDI-redirection effects of MAI might explain the
failure to implement MAI and the emergency of coordination failures that give
rise to multiple equilibria. We have also shown that after the implementation of
MAI some countries (either MAI members or outsiders) could lose. This might
explain why we have recently seen some countries strongly opposing the mere
proposal of MAI.

Our model is highly stylized. However, the main message is likely to remain
unchanged in a framework where MNEs decide upon their locations taking into
account countries’ market size, factor prices, or trade barriers. We expect in-
stead that a more sophisticated representation of the process of MAI implemen-
tation may affect our conclusions. Future work should check the robustness of
our results when, for instance, MNEs are engaged in active lobbying, or when
countries weigh differently the welfare of different agents when deciding about
MAI membership.

21



More intriguing information

1. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
6. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
7. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
8. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
9. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
10. The name is absent