The name is absent



import intensity has an even higher coefficient than the dichotomous variable (cfr.
column 4 and 5) which confirms the results of Hasan and Raturi (2003).

The coefficient on the foreign ownership variable is never statistically different from
zero while it seems that the capital and technology variables are positively correlated to
the export decision and negatively to the import decision. The first case is in line with
the findings of the literature while in the second case there it seems to be a substitution
effect between firm’s capital and technology and the capital and technology embodied in
the imported inputs.

Table 3. Export and Import decision: Probit estimations

Dep V

ariable

EXP

IMP

EXP

EXP

IMP

IMP

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

IMP

0.962

[0.191]***

Import share

1.314

[0.380]***

EXP

0.980

[0.187]***

Export Share

0.483

[0.206]**

Share of FO

1.782

0.185

1.288

1.451

-0.064

-0.078

[1.430]

[0.714]

[1.066]

[1.241]

[0.719]

[0.724]

Capital Intensity (t-1)

0.120

0.012

0.122

0.125

-0.022

0.006

[0.042]***

[0.043]

[0.044]***

[0.043]***

[0.045]

[0.043]

Skill Intensity

0.028

0.236

-0.024

-0.002

0.236

0.232

[0.060]

[0.062]***

[0.063]

[0.062]

[0.065]***

[0.063]***

Age of machineries

-0.217

0.083

-0.246

-0.251

0.114

0.121

[0.116]*

[0.123]

[0.122]**

[0.121]**

[0.127]

[0.124]

Employment (t-1)

0.354

0.326

0.277

0.305

0.251

0.305

[0.070]***

[0.071]***

[0.075]***

[0.072]***

[0.075]***

[0.073]***

Age of the firm

0.295

-0.135

0.326

0.317

-0.195

-0.154

[0.095]***

[0.102]

[0.099]***

[0.099]***

[0.106]*

[0.103]

Average wage (t-1)

0.092

0.116

0.066

0.072

0.109

0.123

[0.055]*

[0.055]**

[0.057]

[0.056]

[0.057]*

[0.055]**

Constant

-4.104

-3.120

-3.319

-3.388

-2.920

-3.144

[0.563]***

[0.555]***

[0.559]***

[0.553]***

[0.574]***

[0.560]***

Observations

501

"487

"487

"487

"487

"487

Log likelihood

-236.29

-205.53

-219.75

-226.07

-190.86

-202.79

Pseudo R2__________

0.3152

0.2986

0.3460

0.3265

0.3487

0.3080

Notes:

Robust Standard errors in brackets

Sector and year dummies included in all the equations

* significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%

Naturally, considering import and export we are referring to different decisions
nonetheless our analysis shows that there is a linkage between the two. The reasons for

10



More intriguing information

1. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
2. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
3. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
4. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
5. The name is absent
6. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
10. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster