Public Debt Management in Brazil



Table Al - Estimated Model, sample 1999:03 2003:07

Coeff

S.E.

t — ratio

Adj.R2

SEeq.

SE dep.va

DW

μo

-0.132

0.182

-072

0.85

0.156

0.406

2.01

μι

0.254

0.114

213

μ2

19.78

11.22

1.76

μ3

187.8

68.34

2.75

μ4

0.618

0.116

5.32

δ0

0.032

0.021

1.53

0.97

0.036

0.249

1.95

δ

0.977

0.032

30.2

δ2

-2.724

1.010

-2.69

δ3

0.044

0.019

2.23

δ4

0.215

0.028

717

Yo

0.037

0.013

2.79

0.40

0.020

0.026

1.77

Yi

0.465

0.173

268

Y2

-0.244

0.162

-1.50

Y3

-1.452

0.680

-2.13

Y4

-0.020

0.007

-256

αo

-0.0005

0.0002

-2.04

0.98

0.0004

0.0028

1.44

α1

0.9470

0.0370

251

α2

0.0077

0.0039

1.99

α3

0.0017

0.0005

3.42

α4

0.0002

0.00004

5.97

P

0.866

0.034

24.9

0.94

0.0006

0.0025

1.04

β

0.012

0.001

101

βi

1.569

0.394

3.97

β2

0.025

0.013

1.97



More intriguing information

1. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
2. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
3. The name is absent
4. Alzheimer’s Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
5. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
6. The name is absent
7. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
8. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
9. The name is absent
10. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM