The name is absent



Table 3

Forecast accuracy of alternative Phillips curves, USA, 1978:1 — 2006:4

h________

_____________x = GDP_____________

x = unemployment rate

sMed

sDf

sMom

sWMed

s 20

sM.

sDf

sMom

sWMed

s 20

1 RMSFE

0.91

0.92

1.08

0.93

0.94

0.92

0.93

1.11

0.94

0.96

DM

-1.80**

-1.53*

1.17

-1.17

-1.28

-1.55*

-1.30*

1.66**

-0.99

-0.88

MDM

-1.79**

-1.52*

1.16

-1.16

-1.27

-1.54*

-1.29

1.65*

-0.98

-0.87

2 RMSFE

0.87

0.86

1.18

0.92

0.85

0.85

0.85

1.18

0.91

0.84

DM

-1.47*

-1.51*

2.17**

-1.24

-1.51*

-1.74**

-1.78**

2.39***

-1.18

-1.73**

MDM

-1.44*

-1.48*

2.13**

-1.22

-1.48*

-1.71**

-1.75**

2.35**

-1.16

-1.70**

3 RMSFE

0.85

0.85

1.16

0.93

0.84

0.83

0.83

1.15

0.91

0.85

DM

-1.67**

-1.69**

2.56***

-1.09

-1.82**

-1.99**

-1.98**

2.47***

-1.37*

-2.31**

MDM

-1.62*

-1.64*

2.49***

-1.06

-1.77**

-1.93**

-1.92**

2.40***

-1.33*

-2.24**

4 RMSFE

0.83

0.84

1.18

0.86

0.82

0.86

0.86

1.24

0.89

0.85

DM

-2.01**

-2.07**

3.35***

-1.67**

-2.02**

-1.61*

-1.66**

2.95***

-1.35*

-1.62*

MDM

-1.93**

-1.98**

3.21***

-1.60*

-1.94**

-1.54*

-1.59*

2.83***

-1.29

-1.55*

5 RMSFE

0.82

0.82

1.18

0.82

0.78

0.81

0.81

1.19

0.81

0.77

DM

-1.99**

-2.25**

2.63***

-2.02**

-2.18**

-2.25**

-2.53***

2.65***

-2.36***

-2.41***

MDM

-1.88**

-2.13**

2.49***

-1.91**

-2.06**

-2.13**

-2.39***

2.51***

-2.23**

-2.28**

6 RMSFE

0.84

0.83

1.18

0.83

0.79

0.81

0.80

1.18

0.79

0.74

DM

-2.37***

-2.85***

3.11***

-1.89**

-2.32**

-2.20**

-2.46***

2.33***

-2.16**

-2.40***

MDM

-2.21**

-2.66***

2.90***

-1.76**

-2.17**

-2.05**

-2.30**

2.18**

-2.02**

-2.24**

7 RMSFE

0.83

0.81

1.17

0.81

0.77

0.76

0.75

1.12

0.73

0.69

DM

-2.66***

-3.83***

3.46***

-1.92**

-2.21**

-2.49***

-2.73***

1.97**

-2.42***

-2.61***

MDM

-2.45***

-3.53***

3.19***

-1.77**

-2.03**

-2.29**

-2.51***

1.81**

-2.23**

-2.40***

8 RMSFE

0.80

0.79

1.13

0.76

0.75

0.74

0.72

1.09

0.68

0.65

DM

-2.56***

-2.95***

2.10**

-2.18**

-1.95**

-2.61***

-2.75***

1.24

-2.92***

-2.76***

MDM

-2.32**

-2.68***

1.91**

-1.98**

-1.77**

-2.37**

-2.50***

1.13

-2.65***

-2.50***

Notes: The Table reports the RMSFE relative to the Phillips curve benchmark model. Relative RMFSEs
smaller than 1 are documented in bold print. The lag length is set to minimize the Schwarz-information
criteria. (M)DM indicates the (modified) Diebold-Mariano test statistic. *** (**) (*) denotes significance at
the 0.99 (0.95) (0.90) level.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Fertility in Developing Countries
3. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
4. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
5. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
6. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China
7. The name is absent
8. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
9. The name is absent
10. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks