The name is absent



Table A.31 Malaysia: Post-Tokyo

Round and post-Uruguay Round bound rates, GTAP sectors

(percent)

Bound rates with proxy ad valorem equivalents
of specific bound rates

Simple average of ad
valorem bound rates

Tokyo      Tokyo

calculated     used

Uruguay
calculated

Uruguay
used

GTAP
code

GTAP sector

HS6
lines

Tokyo

Uruguay

(Used = higher of MFN
applied, Uruguay, Tokyo)

(Used = higher of MFN
applied, Uruguay)

1

Paddy rice

2

45.0

40.0

45.0

45.0

40.0

40.0

2

Wheat

2

4.0

2.5

4.0

4.0

2.5

2.5

3

Cereal grains, other

10

4.6

2.0

4.6

4.6

2.0

2.6

4

Vegetables, fruit, nuts

85

6.5

7.3

9.7

10.6

10.6

10.6

5

Oil seeds

16

6.7

4.1

6.7

6.7

4.1

5.0

6

Sugar cane, sugar beet

2

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

7

Plant-based fibers

8

2.0

3.6

2.0

3.6

3.6

3.6

8

Crops, other

64

7.7

4.2

7.7

59.2

59.2

59.2

9

Bovine cattle, sheep and goats

8

5.3

4.4

5.3

5.3

4.4

4.4

10

Animal products, other

46

10.2

8.3

10.2

10.2

8.3

8.3

12

Wool, silkworm cocoons

6

5.6

4.2

5.6

5.6

4.2

4.2

13

Forestry

28

12.5

9.2

13.0

13.0

9.7

11.5

14

Fishing

41

12.3

7.1

12.3

12.3

7.1

9.1

15

Coal

6

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

16

Oil

2

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

17

Gas

2

ND

ND

32.8

32.8

32.8

32.8

18

Minerals, other

96

3.8

8.2

3.8

8.2

8.2

8.2

19

Bovine meat products

30

14.8

11.1

14.8

14.8

11.4

11.4

20

Meat products, other

38

61.9

53.9

61.7

61.7

53.7

53.7

21

Vegetable oils and fats

46

8.4

6.8

8.4

8.4

6.8

6.8

22

Dairy products

21

16.1

9.9

15.3

15.3

10.0

11.3

23

Processed rice

2

38.8

33.8

38.8

38.8

33.8

33.8

24

Sugar containing products

7

9.2

8.5

9.2

9.2

8.5

8.5

25

Food products, other

245

18.6

10.7

19.4

19.4

11.5

15.3

26

Beverages and tobacco products

29

21.0

7.5

22.7

782.6

782.6

782.6

27

Textiles

569

24.3

18.3

24.8

24.8

18.3

19.9

28

Wearing apparel

241

32.4

20.8

32.4

32.4

20.8

25.8

29

Leather products

68

29.0

22.6

29.1

29.3

22.5

29.2

30

Wood products

89

30.3

21.7

30.4

30.4

21.6

24.8

31

Paper products

151

12.2

17.0

12.4

17.0

17.0

17.0

32

Petroleum, coal products

15

10.0

6.7

10.0

10.0

6.7

7.8

33

Chemical, rubber, plastic products

959

12.7

12.7

12.6

12.8

12.8

12.8

34

Mineral products, other

161

18.0

19.4

18.5

19.6

19.4

19.6

35

Ferrous metals

167

16.0

26.6

15.4

26.6

26.6

26.6

36

Metals, other

168

8.1

9.5

8.2

9.5

9.5

9.5

37

Metal products

215

23.2

23.2

23.6

23.6

23.3

23.3

38

Motor vehicles and parts

54

24.6

18.6

24.6

24.6

18.6

24.1

39

Transport equipment, other

82

11.5

10.8

11.5

11.5

10.8

11.4

40

Electronic equipment

119

20.4

10.9

20.4

20.4

10.9

15.6

41

Machinery and equipment, other

853

9.8

10.7

9.8

10.7

10.7

10.7

42

Manufactures, other

178

12.7

14.3

12.8

14.3

14.3

14.3

ND = No data

Notes: Ad valorem bound rates are directly from WTO/GATT schedules. Where specific rates exist, the average of applied tariff ad valorem equivalents
from 1991 and 1993 was spliced into the Tokyo schedule (1996 for GTAP 17), and tariff equivalents from 1996 into the Uruguay schedule.

Sources: WTO (2008); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008).

77



More intriguing information

1. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
2. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
3. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles
4. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
5. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
6. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
7. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
8. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
9. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
10. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE