Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10



3 Taxes, family support and income tests

Australia is widely viewed as having a progressive tax on individual incomes.
However, the rate schedule of a country’s income tax system is set not solely by the
schedule of rates applying to personal income but also by the design of income tests
for benefits, exemptions, credits and offsets. The focus of the analysis here is on the
high rates of tax faced by married women as second earners under a system of
effective joint taxation, introduced by targeting the Medicare Levy (ML) exemption
and Family Tax Benefit Part A (FTB-A) on the basis of joint income, and the
withdrawal of Family Tax Benefit Part B (FTB-B) on the income of the second
earner. The Medicare Safety Net, which is linked to FTB-A, is also at fault. The
section first explains the structure of tax rates created by these policy instruments
based on hypothetical cases, and then goes on to present an empirical analysis of the
impact on families using household survey data.

3.1 Structures of tax rates

We compare two hypothetical families, the first with one partner in full time work and
the second with both partners in full time work, to show how the above policy
measures set high rates on the income of a second earner. For convenience, we label
the single-earner household “H1” and the two-earner household, “H2”. Each
household is assumed to have two children, one aged under 5 and the other under 13
years, and to decide first on the primary earner’s labour supply and then to choose the
labour supply of the second partner. The male partner is taken to be the primary
earner. All adults face the same gross wage and have zero non-labour incomes. Under
these assumptions the two households have the same primary incomes, but the H1
household has only half the joint income of the H2 household because the female
partner in H1 has chosen to specialise in the home production of childcare and related
services rather than in market work.

Figure 1a plots the profile of marginal tax rates (MTRs) that apply to the income of
the primary earner in each household when the 2006-07 schedule of MTRs on



More intriguing information

1. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
2. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
8. Trade Openness and Volatility
9. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
10. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
11. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
12. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
13. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
14. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
15. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
16. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
17. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
18. Midwest prospects and the new economy
19. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
20. The name is absent