Table 1: Resident mean (SE) scores for agitation, neuropsychological status1 and
quality of life2, by intervention group at each time point, adjusted for covariates
that differed at baseline3.
|
Pre |
Post |
Follow-up |
p values4 | |
|
Agitation (CMAI) | ||||
|
DCM |
46.1 (6.5) |
45.1 (6.6) |
43.7 (6.5) |
P(Group) = 0.33 |
|
PCC |
47.5 (9.1) |
41.7 (9.2) |
37.2 (9.1) |
P(Time) = 0.47 |
|
^^UC |
50.3 (6.8) |
58.7 (6.9) |
57.7 (6.8) |
P(G x T) = 0.005 |
|
Neuropsychological status (NPI) | ||||
|
DCM |
12.7 (5.1) |
16.8 (5.1) |
13.5 (5.1) |
P(Group) = 0.68 |
|
PCC |
21.3 (6.8) |
14.5 (6.9) |
12.6 (6.9) |
P(Time) = 0.05 |
|
^^UC |
16.9 (5.3) |
20.2 (5.4) |
15.3 (5.3) |
P(G x T) = 0.30 |
|
Quality of life (QUALID) | ||||
|
DCM |
23.5 (1.6) |
23.4 (1.6) |
24.5 (1.6) |
P(Group) = 0.78 |
|
PCC |
22.7 (2.2) |
21.5 (2.2) |
20.8 (2.2) |
P(Time) = 0.80 |
|
^^UC |
23.2 (1.7) |
23.7 (1.7) |
24.4 (1.7) |
P(G x T) = 0.33 |
|
1. NPI scores: means and S |
E from analysis o |
untransformed data; p values from | ||
analysis of square-root transformed data, significant covariates were GDS
(p=0.01) and RCS (p=0.02).
2. QUALID ; significant covariates were GDS (p=0.006) and RCS (p=0.0003).
3. Six covariates differed at baseline: TESS-NH safety score, QUIS positive social
score, RCS total score, GDS score, country of birth and number of co-morbid
diseases.
4. p values from hierarchical linear models with all three time points included as
outcomes: p(Group) is for main effect of intervention, p(Time) is for main effect
of time (over three time points) and p(GxT) is for the interaction between group
and time.
More intriguing information
1. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren2. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered
3. The name is absent
4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
5. The name is absent
6. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
7. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
8. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent