The name is absent

PftQPQATicw QF ERRORS

⅛∣WC' -^, M типbrτ іі Гiπtτalisі ⅛fll aid OffrMiSt (τφll> 111ІГUiKlC CT
В' Д Гц IililiUCi -.-Ill) kħ< Jvnchmnimil ιL±ι⅛ UlplCtK ягїі тії к І i∙.p PUniL
[-.Tjvninrni H: ∣T∣) Ik: Λl⅛ ofibt Jtnihe when Uιum⅞sk wn∏rw≡taJ
Al lh9 HiHtBdiiIr αH⅛ оі Lhc Slimuius І middle panel: EhIMJtiual -1;
ігкі(ci IhcaʃQk)τuaii whκn∣hrιtrul⅛ишpresf∏i4i∣mhei∏kJtκ-
(1i⅛rf qfl⅛ct αt^,⅛ W.L∏-J±LJi I Lτ3↑⅛πι римі: Πs∏EriιιlιcUt J)

/^zfjt‰∕V.∙' CQrretireiuilI r-fhr-tti rrcm id(ILti⅛ шхіjlaιnlπι∙arrayIitctrtinn
(tι>p pancl∖ Ihe IivJiiIatiiLit)' Ot jL√ju jEil<ιπtuιli<ιπ tmɪddle p*ι∣∙κ^,J)_z and ’,tic
avwiihiliry о/квапиш івіїн-таїзип (hrtτr<τm pιπ<^,lj ∙⅛3 a ⅛ΛCLK>o σΓχ*n-
ChlCtluudplιtbe and mιr⅛4πfr∏thnultH iθlCΓi4J∣!151HE⅛perπ∏i!∏s 11

No masking

Mask present

Discussion

My contention is that intralist and extralist intrusion errors are ambiguous indices
of loss of location information and loss of item information, respectively. For this reason
the two types of errors were not used in deriving the experimental predictions of this
study. Nonetheless, it is necessary to ensure that the experiments in this study are
comparable to Mewhort et al.'s (1981) experiments in terms of these errors. For this
reason, intralist and extralist intrusion errors have been reported for comparison purposes.
As has been shown, when scored in terms of intralist and extralist intrusions, results from
the no-masking and the masking conditions of this experiment are comparable to those
obtained under Mewhort et al.'s (1981) Conditions 1 and 2, respectively.

The proportion of trials in which both item identity and its location were correctly
recalled was treated as a measure of partial-report performance. In terms of the new index

<<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >>

More intriguing information