|
Sadness |
Near (0, 1, 2) |
|
Conformity_______ |
Near (0.5, 0.5, 2) |
|
Ecstasy |
Near (1, 0.5, 0.3) |
|
Rage |
Near (0.4, 1, 1.5) |
|
Pride |
Near (1, 0, 1.5) |
|
Shame__________ |
Near (0, 1, 1.5) |
|
Anger |
Near (0, 1, 2.5) |
|
Jealousy |
Near (1, 0.8, 0) |
|
Lust |
Near (0.8, 0.3, 2.7) |
|
Sorrow |
Near (0, 1, 0.5) |
|
Revenge__________ |
Near (0.5, 1, 0.5) |
|
Tenderness_______ |
Near (1, 0.2, 2.3) |
|
Enthusiasm |
Near (1, 0, 1.3) |
|
Surprise |
Near (0.8, 0.8, 2) |
Tabela 1. Emogoes representadas com o modelo. (In: GERSHENSON, 1999,
p.44-45)
Determinado o ponto onde se situa cada emogao, Gershenson define um
espago tridimensional, uma esfera de raio arbitrario em torno de cada ponto.
Assim, "se a distancia de A para Xe menor que ou igual a 0.1, A e considerado
como pertencente a emogao X. Entao, conforme a distancia aumente, A e
considerado ainda pertencente a emogao X, mas em menor grau, ate que,
finalmente, ele nao tenha nenhum grau de X" (Gershenson, 1999). O conjunto
de equagoes utilizado e o seguinte:
rl→∣X-A∣≤Ojl
< l-(10x(∣X -A∣-0jl))→ O,1<∣X-A∣<0j2 (5)
[θ→Oj2≤∣X-A∣
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
3. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
4. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
5. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
6. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
7. The name is absent
8. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
9. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
10. An alternative way to model merit good arguments