Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model



The ui , vi , i = 1, 2 are functions of KR, JR, but not explic-
itly of R itself.

We expand these equations about the critical value KR =
K
C and about JR = 0, obtaining

Solving this for RC and substituting into the first of equa-
tion (2) gives, as a first iteration of a far more general proce-
dure (e.g. Shirkov and Kovalev, 2001)

H [K, 0] H Kr20]
f(RC)


Ho
f (Rr )


dKR/dR = (KR-Kr)ydlog(f)/dR+(KR-Kr)z/R
dJ
R/dR = wJRdlog(f)/dR + xJR/R.

(6)

The terms y =     du1 /dKR |KR =KC , z     =

du2/dKR|KR=KC, w = v1(Kr, 0), x = v2(Kr, 0) are
constants.

Solving the first of these equations gives

χ(K, 0) χ(Kc/2, 0)Rr = XoRr

(10)

which are the essential relationships.

Note that a power law of the form f(R) = Rm, m = 3,
which is the direct physical analog, may not be biologically
reasonable, since it says that ‘language richness’ can grow
very rapidly as a function of increased network size. Such
rapid growth is simply not observed.

If we take the biologically realistic example of non-integral
‘fractal’ exponential growth,

KR = Kr + (K - Kr)Rzf(R)y,

(7)


f(R) = Rδ,


(11)

again remembering that K1 = K, J1 = J, f(1) = 1.

Wilson’s essential trick is to iterate on this relation, which
is supposed to converge rapidly (Binney, 1986), assuming that
for K
R near Kr , we have

where δ > 0 is a real number which may be quite small, we
can solve equation (8) for R
r, obtaining

Rr =


[KC∕(KC - K)][V(δy+z)]
2V(
δy+z)

Kr/2 Kr + (K - Kr)Rzf (R)y.

(12)


(8)

We iterate in two steps, first solving this for f(R) in terms
of known values, and then solving for R, finding a value R
r
that we then substitute into the first of equations (2) to obtain
an expression for H [K, 0] in terms of known functions and
parameter values.

The first step gives the general result

for K near Kr . Note that, for a given value of y , we might
want to characterize the relation α
δy + z = constant as
a “tunable universality class relation” in the sense of Albert
and Barabasi (2002).

Substituting this value for Rr back into equation (9) gives
a somewhat more complex expression for H than equation
(2), having three parameters, i.e. δ, y, z .

A more biologically interesting choice for f (R) is a loga-
rithmic curve that ‘tops out’, for example

(9)


f(Rr)


[KC∕(KC - K)]1/y
21/y RzRv


f(R) = m log(R) + 1.

(13)




More intriguing information

1. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
2. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art
3. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
4. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
5. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
6. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
7. The name is absent
8. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
9. The name is absent
10. Transfer from primary school to secondary school
11. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
12. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
13. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
14. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
15. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
16. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
17. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
18. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
19. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
20. Who runs the IFIs?