Figure 2. Behavioral results. a) Accuracy. Graph depicts the average number of sets
completed (out of a maximum of 6 sets in a hyperset) in the early and late stages. As
learning progressed, the number of sets completed (accuracy) increased significantly
from early to late stage in all the settings (p<0.0001). Accuracy in the normal settings
(NormalM and NormalV) was similar throughout the experiment. Although accuracy
in the early stage seemed higher in the motor than in the visual setting, thereafter it
remained similar in both the settings. b) Set completion time. Graph depicts the
average set completion time (in sec) in the early and late stages. As learning
progressed, it required significantly less time to perform a set. Again, while the
completion times were similar in the normal settings (NormalM and NormalV), they
were much shorter for the motor than for the visual setting. Significance levels: ***
indicates p<0.0001, ** p<0.001 and * p<0.01, NS is Not Significant.
More intriguing information
1. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.2. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
3. The name is absent
4. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
5. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
6. The name is absent
7. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
8. The name is absent
9. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
10. The name is absent