Figure 2. Behavioral results. a) Accuracy. Graph depicts the average number of sets
completed (out of a maximum of 6 sets in a hyperset) in the early and late stages. As
learning progressed, the number of sets completed (accuracy) increased significantly
from early to late stage in all the settings (p<0.0001). Accuracy in the normal settings
(NormalM and NormalV) was similar throughout the experiment. Although accuracy
in the early stage seemed higher in the motor than in the visual setting, thereafter it
remained similar in both the settings. b) Set completion time. Graph depicts the
average set completion time (in sec) in the early and late stages. As learning
progressed, it required significantly less time to perform a set. Again, while the
completion times were similar in the normal settings (NormalM and NormalV), they
were much shorter for the motor than for the visual setting. Significance levels: ***
indicates p<0.0001, ** p<0.001 and * p<0.01, NS is Not Significant.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
6. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
7. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
8. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
9. The name is absent
10. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity