Figure 12: Illustration of dominates
5.1 Definition of dominates.
Definition [13] p.85
Node A dominates node B iff:
i) h(A) is higher up or at the same height on the tree as h(B) i.e.h(A) ≥ h(B)
ii) it is possible to trace a line from A to B going only downward,
or at most going to one higher node.
Remarks
The first requirement is that A is at a greater height than B. The second re-
quirement restricts the possible downward route from A to B so that it contains
at most one upward segment.
Example (compare [13] p.83)The phrase tree Figure 12 gives the ‘dominates’
matrix:
|
• |
S |
NP (S) |
N(S) |
AUX |
VP |
V |
NP (E) |
Det |
N(e) |
|
S |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
NP (S) |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
N(S) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
AUX |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
D = AVUPX |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 (23) |
|
V |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
NP(E) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Det |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
N(E) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
where 1 indicates “A dominates B”
and 0 indicates that it does not.
14
More intriguing information
1. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln2. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
3. The name is absent
4. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
5. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
6. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
7. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
8. The name is absent
9. Categorial Grammar and Discourse
10. Citizenship