Figure 11: The Distance Between Verbs and Adjectives.
Constructing other examples gives the ultrametric distance matrix
U=
|
• |
D |
N |
V |
A |
P |
|
D |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
N |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
V |
. |
. |
0 |
4 |
3 |
|
A |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
3 |
|
P |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(16)
Ignoring the determiner D (‘a’ or ‘the’) and ordering the matrix NPVA (noun,
pronoun, verb, adjective) suggests the pattern
0i i i
. 0 i+1 i+1
(17)
. . 0 i+2
.. . 0
which is compatible with the X matrix of the last section; however it does not
follow by necessity as the X case holds for a single sentence and U is constructed
from the syntactical representations of several sentences.
4 Features
4.1 No square matrix representation of features
This section investigates whether there is a general framework which can de-
scribe both the preceding and also “features”. Roughly speaking the idea behind
12
More intriguing information
1. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
5. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
6. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
7. The name is absent
8. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
9. The name is absent
10. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations