Figure 11: The Distance Between Verbs and Adjectives.
Constructing other examples gives the ultrametric distance matrix
U=
|
• |
D |
N |
V |
A |
P |
|
D |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
N |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
V |
. |
. |
0 |
4 |
3 |
|
A |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
3 |
|
P |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(16)
Ignoring the determiner D (‘a’ or ‘the’) and ordering the matrix NPVA (noun,
pronoun, verb, adjective) suggests the pattern
0i i i
. 0 i+1 i+1
(17)
. . 0 i+2
.. . 0
which is compatible with the X matrix of the last section; however it does not
follow by necessity as the X case holds for a single sentence and U is constructed
from the syntactical representations of several sentences.
4 Features
4.1 No square matrix representation of features
This section investigates whether there is a general framework which can de-
scribe both the preceding and also “features”. Roughly speaking the idea behind
12
More intriguing information
1. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study2. The name is absent
3. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
4. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
5. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
6. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
7. The name is absent
8. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
9. New issues in Indian macro policy.
10. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model