Figure 11: The Distance Between Verbs and Adjectives.
Constructing other examples gives the ultrametric distance matrix
U=
|
• |
D |
N |
V |
A |
P |
|
D |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
N |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
V |
. |
. |
0 |
4 |
3 |
|
A |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
3 |
|
P |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(16)
Ignoring the determiner D (‘a’ or ‘the’) and ordering the matrix NPVA (noun,
pronoun, verb, adjective) suggests the pattern
0i i i
. 0 i+1 i+1
(17)
. . 0 i+2
.. . 0
which is compatible with the X matrix of the last section; however it does not
follow by necessity as the X case holds for a single sentence and U is constructed
from the syntactical representations of several sentences.
4 Features
4.1 No square matrix representation of features
This section investigates whether there is a general framework which can de-
scribe both the preceding and also “features”. Roughly speaking the idea behind
12
More intriguing information
1. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California2. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
3. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
4. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
5. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
6. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
7. The name is absent
8. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
9. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
10. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model