
Figure 11: The Distance Between Verbs and Adjectives.
Constructing other examples gives the ultrametric distance matrix
U=
• |
D |
N |
V |
A |
P |
D |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
N |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
V |
. |
. |
0 |
4 |
3 |
A |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
3 |
P |
. |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(16)
Ignoring the determiner D (‘a’ or ‘the’) and ordering the matrix NPVA (noun,
pronoun, verb, adjective) suggests the pattern
0i i i
. 0 i+1 i+1
(17)
. . 0 i+2
.. . 0
which is compatible with the X matrix of the last section; however it does not
follow by necessity as the X case holds for a single sentence and U is constructed
from the syntactical representations of several sentences.
4 Features
4.1 No square matrix representation of features
This section investigates whether there is a general framework which can de-
scribe both the preceding and also “features”. Roughly speaking the idea behind
12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
4. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
5. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
6. The name is absent
7. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
8. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent