Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance



marriage as perceived by agents in the modern micro-realms emerging the high numbers of
domestic partnership instead of marriage and reproduction, pursuing of fun through sexual
experiences, as the negative population growth persists while in the other hand the average
economic circumstances getting better generally, are some of those that we could
essentially observe by using the computational platform. Here we open a possible
interesting challenge on bridging the evolutionary theories and the general sociological
explorations. As we recognize the complexity of the social and natural system, we just
consequently recognize the complexity inside the way men and women mate.

Acknowledgement

I thank Surya Research International for financial support.

References

Buss, D. M. (1986). “Preferences in Human Mate Selection”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (3): 559-70.

Buss, D. M. (1993). “Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating”. Psychological Review 100
(2): 204-32.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard UP.

Hill, S. E., Reeve, H. K. (2004). “Mating Games: The Evolution of Human Mating Transactions”. Behavioral Ecology 15 (5):
748-56.

Holmstrom, K., Jensen, H. J. (2004). “Who Runs Fastest in an Adaptive Landscape: Sexual versus Asexual Reproduction”.
Physica A 337: 185-95.

Khanafiah, D., SItungkir, H. (2004). “Social Balance Theory: Revisiting Heider’s Balance Theory for Many Agents”. BFI
Working Paper Series
WPN2004. Bandung Fe Institute.

Liao, X., & Ran, J. (2007). “Hopf Bifurcation in Love Dynamical Models with Nonlinear Couples and Time Delays”. Chaos,
Solitons, and Fractals
31: 853-65.

Marazziti, D., Canale, D. (2004). “Hormonal Changes when Falling in Love”. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29: 931-36.

Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. Doubleday.

Rinaldi, S. (1998). “Love Dynamics: The Case of Linear Couples”. Applied Mathematics and Computation 95: 181-92.

Shackelford, T. K., Schimtt, D. P., Buss, D. M. (2005). “Universal Dimensions of Human Mate Preferences”. Personality and
Individual Differences
39: 447-58.

Situngkir, H. (2003). “Cultural Studies through Complexity Sciences: Beyond Postmodern Culture without Postmodern
Theorists”.
BFI Working Paper Series WPM2003. Bandung Fe Institute.

Situngkir, H. (2004). “On Selfish Meme: Culure as Complex Adaptive System”.Journal of Social Complexity 2 (1): 20-32.

Situngkir, H. (2007). “The Ribbon of Love: Fuzzy-Ruled Agents in Artificial Society”. BFI Working Paper Series WPB2007.

van den Berghe, Pierre L. (1990). “Why most sociologists don't (and won’t) think evolutionarily”. Sociological Forum, 5,
173-185.

Strogatz, S. H. (1988). "Love Affairs and Differential Equations". Mathematics Magazine 61 (1): 35.

Page | 10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
3. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
8. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent