55
0.31%±0.02% SEM, paired t-test with 11 degrees of freedom, p=0.0001). The response
in the STSms to each of the Six trials types was also entered into a three-factor mixed-
effect ANOVA with stimulus modality (tactile, auditory, tactile-auditory) and intensity
(weak, strong) as fixed factors and subject as a random factor. The most significant
effect was modality (F(2,22)=10.3, p=0.0007) driven by the increased response to
multisensory stimulation. There was also a significant effect of intensity (F( 1,11)=16.1,
p=0.002), reflecting a larger response to strong compared with weak stimuli
(0.37%±0.02% vs. 0.29%±0.02%). The interaction between modality and intensity was
not significant (F(2,22)=0.1, p=0.9) showing that the degree of multisensory
enhancement did not differ between weak and strong multisensory trials.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
5. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
6. The name is absent
7. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
8. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
9. The name is absent
10. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD