55
0.31%±0.02% SEM, paired t-test with 11 degrees of freedom, p=0.0001). The response
in the STSms to each of the Six trials types was also entered into a three-factor mixed-
effect ANOVA with stimulus modality (tactile, auditory, tactile-auditory) and intensity
(weak, strong) as fixed factors and subject as a random factor. The most significant
effect was modality (F(2,22)=10.3, p=0.0007) driven by the increased response to
multisensory stimulation. There was also a significant effect of intensity (F( 1,11)=16.1,
p=0.002), reflecting a larger response to strong compared with weak stimuli
(0.37%±0.02% vs. 0.29%±0.02%). The interaction between modality and intensity was
not significant (F(2,22)=0.1, p=0.9) showing that the degree of multisensory
enhancement did not differ between weak and strong multisensory trials.
More intriguing information
1. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China2. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
3. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
4. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
5. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
6. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
7. The name is absent
8. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
9. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
10. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power