The name is absent



57

Experiment 2

In Experiment 1, subjects performed a discrimination task, manually pressing a
button in response to each sensory stimulus. It could be argued that the observed STS
activations were the result of cognitive processes involved in task performance, rather
than simple sensory responses. To address this possibility, in Experiment 2 subjects
received somatosensory Vibrotactile stimulation on their hands and feet that did not
require a behavioral response (Beauchamp, et al. 2007).

Because tactile stimuli were delivered bilaterally, we expected responses to be
evoked in both left and right hemispheres. Consistent with this, we observed activation
in the left and right postcentral gyrus, parietal operculum and STS (Fig. ЗА). Localizers
were used to map auditory and visually-responsive brain regions. Auditory responses
were observed in the temporal plane, inferior frontal cortex, and the STS (Fig. 3B) while
visual responses were found primarily in the occipital lobe and the STS. A conjunction
analysis revealed a focus Oftrisensory activation in posterior STS in the single subject
(Fig. 3D) and group average activation maps (Fig. 3E). The center-pf-mass of the average
STS activation was (56,41,14) in the right hemisphere and (-44,35,13) in the left
hemisphere.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and its determinants in first 6 months of life: A prospective study
3. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
4. The name is absent
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. The name is absent
7. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
8. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
9. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
10. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary