Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues



Journal of Vision (2007) 7(8):1, 1-12

Schofield, Ledgeway, & Hutchinson

12


Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Benton, C. P. (1999).
Robust velocity computation from a biologically
motivated model of motion perception. Proceed-
ings of the Royal Society of London Series B:
Biological Sciences, 266, 509-518.

Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Buxton, H. (1992). A
computational model of the analysis of some first-
order and second-order motion patterns by simple and
complex cells.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London B: Biological Sciences, 250,
297 - 306.
[
PubMed]

Kingdom, F. A., Keeble, D., & Moulden, B. (1995).
Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-
based textures.
Vision Research, 35, 79-91.
[
PubMed]

Kingdom, F. A., Prins, N., & Hayes, A. (2003). Mecha-
nism independence for texture-modulation detection
is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter mechanism.
Visual Neuroscience, 20, 65-76. [PubMed]

Klein, S. A., Hu, Q. J., & Carney, T. (1996). The adjacent
pixel nonlinearity: Problems and solutions.
Vision
Research, 36,
3167-3181. [PubMed]

Landy, M. S., & Bergen, J. R. (1991). Texture segrega-
tion and orientation gradient.
Vision Research, 31,
679-691. [PubMed]

Ledgeway, T. (1994). Adaptation to second-order
motion results in a motion aftereffect for direction-
ally-ambiguous test stimuli.
Vision Research, 34,
2879-2889. [PubMed]

Ledgeway, T., & Hutchinson, C. V. (2006). Is the
direction of second-order, contrast-defined motion
patterns visible to standard motion-energy detectors:
A model answer?
Vision Research, 46, 556-567.
[
PubMed]

Ledgeway, T., & Smith, A. T. (1994a). Evidence for
separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- order
and second-order motion in human vision.
Vision
Research, 34,
2727-2740. [PubMed]

Ledgeway, T., & Smith, A. T. (1994b). The duration of
the motion aftereffect following adaptation to first-
order and second-order motion.
Perception, 23,
1211-1219. [PubMed]

Levinson, E., & Sekuler, R. (1975). The independence of
channels in human vision selective for direction of
movement.
The Journal of Physiology, 250, 347-366.
[
PubMed] [Article]

Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (1995). The functional
architecture of human visual motion perception.
Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722. [PubMed]

Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of
human visual motion perception: Review and update.
Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics,
image science, and vision, 18,
2331-2370. [PubMed]
Lu, Z. L., Sperling, G., & Beck, J. R. (1997). Selective
adaptation of three motion systems.
Investigative
Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 38,
1105.

Mareschal, I., Ashida, H., Bex, P. J., Nishida, S., &
Verstraten, F. A. (1997). Linking lower and higher
stages of motion processing?
Vision Research, 37,
1755-1759. [PubMed]

Nishida, S., Ledgeway, T., & Edwards, M. (1997). Dual
multiple-scale processing for motion in the human
visual system.
Vision Research, 37, 2685-2698.
[
PubMed]

Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with
flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion
processing.
Vision Research, 35, 477-490. [PubMed]

Schofield, A. J., & Georgeson, M. A. (1999). Sensitivity
to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual
white noise: Separate mechanisms with similar
behaviour.
Vision Research, 39, 2697-2716.
[
PubMed]

Schofield, A. J., & Georgeson, M. A. (2003). Sensitivity
to contrast modulation: The spatial frequency depen-
dence of second-order vision.
Vision Research, 43,
243-259. [PubMed]

Schofield, A. J., Ledgeway, T., & Hutchinson, C. V.
(2006). Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion
aftereffect between first-order and second-order cues.
Perception, 35, 238.

Schofield, A. J., & Yates, T. A. (2005). Interactions
between orientation and contrast modulations suggest
limited cross-cue linkage.
Perception, 34, 769-792.
[
PubMed]

Smith, A. T. (1994). The detection of second-order
motion. In A. T. Smith & R. J. Snowden (Eds.),
Visual detection of motion (pp. 145-176). London:
Academic Press.

Smith, A. T., & Ledgeway, T. (1997). Separate detection
of moving luminance and contrast modulations: Fact
or artifact?
Vision Research, 37, 45- 62. [PubMed]

Sperling, G., & Lu, Z.-L. (1998). A systems analysis of
visual motion perception. In T. Watanabe (Ed.),
High-level motion processing (pp. 153-183). London:
MIT Press.

Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of
wide applicability.
Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18,
292-297.

Wilson, H. R., Ferrera, V. P., & Yo, C. (1992). A
psychophysically motivated model for 2-dimensional
motion perception.
Visual Neuroscience, 9, 79-97.
[
PubMed]

Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen
movement.
British Journal of Psychology: Mono-
graph Supplements, 1,
1-117.



More intriguing information

1. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
2. The name is absent
3. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
4. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
5. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
6. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
7. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
8. The name is absent
9. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
10. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
11. Evolving robust and specialized car racing skills
12. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Who is missing from higher education?
17. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
18. The name is absent
19. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
20. The name is absent