The name is absent



120

Table 4.2: Performance of RSW and POD÷DEIM models of the MIG and MIG-P fork as
compared with the full model. Here Arw = 10, N = 1501, and
is located 20 μm from the
distal end of the parent branch.

RSW model, MIG ion channel model

As

Speed-up

% Matched

% Mismatched

Γ

30

6.8×

98.1

4.6

0.967

40

5.7×

100

_______5.4

0.972

POD÷DEIM model, MIG ion channel model

Alj

Speed-up

% Matched

% Mismatched

Γ

30

16.8×

97.1

2.9

0.971

40

13.4×

97.1

2.9

0.971

RSW model, MIG-P ion channel model

As

Speed-up

% Matched

% Mismatched

Γ

30

9.2×

96.5

14.5

0.904

40

7.5×

98.3____

________1.2

0.985

POD÷DEIM model, MIG-P ion channel model

Ay

Speed-up

% Matched

% Mismatched

Γ

30

16.3×

96.5

23.3

0.850

40

13.2×

97.1

20.2

0.872

50

10.6×

97.1

19.0

0.879

60

8.4×

97.1

15.7

0.899

70

6.2×

97.1

17.8

0.887

4.3.2 Neuron pl8 Results

With the success of the RSW model on the forked neuron, it is now time to
examine its performance on a realistic cell. The morphologies used in §3.4.3 are not
really good candidates for the RSW model because they lack very well-separated weak
and strong parts. In this section I consider neuron pl8, a pyramidal cell from the
cerebral cortex (Vetter et al., 2001) which has two distinct tufts of dendrites connected



More intriguing information

1. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
6. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
7. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin