117
Q Zs
(4.20)
Thus the discretized strong-weak system is
∂t
Vw
Cγ∏^s
0
0
N(vs(t),ws(t))
ɪ ∣^B‰(t)
2πα∆τ Is(t)
(4.21)
which is of the same form as (4.14). The notable exception here is that the inputs
are now given according to their local indices.
Model reduction of this system follows in the same manner as that of §4.1.1-4.1.2,
yielding the reduced strong-weak system for arbitrary morphologies:
∂t
. U7’ ((⅛‰,3)C)
U7HsU
CmVs
0
RN(U(:, z)v3, ws)
0
UτΦ
ɪ ∣^B‰(t)^
2πa∆x [uτIs(t) '
(4.22)
One important point should be made concerning the selection of snapshots for
both the POD and DEIM. Although it may seem reasonable to take snapshots of
the strong branches from the simulation of the strong-weak system, this yielded very
poor results for realistic morphologies. However, if the snapshots are taken of these
branches from the full system simulation then the results improve dramatically.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
5. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
6. Factores de alteração da composição da Despesa Pública: o caso norte-americano
7. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke
8. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
9. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
10. Workforce or Workfare?