55
250 random strong inputs, Vth = [22 22 16 14], τ,θf = 4 ms
æ × 9 ®® 9® ×ββ)S8×8 ®xx ®x ®®x x )9×3<30
20 -× ×× ® к ®D ® × × ®<® ×K)× ×× ®юс ® ©c ×× x®9 ® ® ©
×βB9 × ® ®3 × ×X3 ®® ×SSB 9® × ® × ® × x®® ©<
3 ® ®x x XX ® × ® )® × ® ® O ®x ® x® x®
®© × × QB®® XX ® x x® × × x® ®® O ® 5®®
× 93 × 9 ® ® ® x ® >® × *3 © ® ×9 ® ®x® xQ®
15*® 9× ®x9 Q® ®x QS> ×9 9∞Φ9O× ®9 9× CX
<9×99O××××× 9 × 99 × ®® ® x® 99 ×O× ×
®($38xO® ×× ®® × ® x® x® × 9КЮ × × ® ® QB
О
jg
ɔ
E
ω
>O9× ® © ® × ®X3®9 © 9 x® × ® × 9 43 9 9
3 ×9β3Q0 9 ©ХЭ®®® XX 93B XX × ® Cβ×>Φ ®x ×
10 - © ®x®9 × 9 99 ®®X ® ® 9 999 x® 93D9 *9 9 XXX
X3 © × ® x® XX <3® QB® 9 X3 ®x ®x® × ®
× ®x × × ® 43 ® Ю 999 × 9 ® ®*O ® XX ® 9® 9
φc ®9 × 9 x9X33B× ××× ®x3x O 9 × 9 ® ×
® x® × ® ×xx® × x®<® × 9 9 ® ® >® ® ®xx 9 OQ × 9
5 3 x®x O 9 © β3 x 9 >99® ® © × 9 9 9 9® ×
® ® × 9 × хЭДЗВх X3D × 9 9 093 9 9 × QO O × 9® ХЭ ×
× ® ×X3× × © ®x®x × ®9® 9 x ®x® × × 9 O 99
3× 9 x X3® ×(S) 999 × 9 ×× 993 × 9 × × ×X8B××
× ®9 xx ® 99 × QD×X39× ×× 9 ®M3 9 9 9× ® × (S3 ×
0-------------------------l-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1-------------------------1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Time (ms)
1250 random weak inputs, Vth = [22 22 16 14], τ = 4 ms
20- β8×βθ 8 8 8 ×
8 8 × >®
χ βa e e о ×e e a
β8 в × S × O x
a × a
15- × в O × X
a a<a a × × ×
⅝ a × × >a × a
a ×e × 9 a ×
о
c5
ɔ
E
ω
× ×a × a κ a
10 - 9 90 × a × о a
9 9 OO 99 O ×
a a x e >a e
8x88 9
9 × × x 8
5 - 68 8 8 × 88
O 9 × a 9
39 9 9 9 9 9 ×
se x x3 × о ee ×
seæ о e a о a × ×
QI--------------------1--------------------ɪ--------------------L------------------1--------------------ɪ--------------------1--------------------1--------------------1--------------------1-------
1000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (ms)
Figure 2.16: Raster diagrams showing spikes computed for the nonlinear system (×,s) and the re-
duced system (o’s) for A) “strong” and B) “weak” input cases demonstrate that a variable-threshold,
multi-site IAF mechanism improves accuracy of spike generation. The same input patterns as used
for Figure 2.14 were applied to the forked neuron, but this time voltages were observed at the soma
and the midpoints of each branch. Threshold values are given in §2.7.2. In total, the “strong” and
“weak” input simulations had match scores of 56% and 65%, respectively, and mismatch scores of
15% and 13%, respectively.
it accurately tracks the quasi-active response at several, say p, distinct locations.
Proper investigation of this issue would address the questions of optimal placement
of p observers, placement and calibration of threshold mechanisms at each site, and
the trade of accuracy for speed as p is increased. We offer here only empirical evidence
More intriguing information
1. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology2. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
3. AN IMPROVED 2D OPTICAL FLOW SENSOR FOR MOTION SEGMENTATION
4. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
5. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
6. The name is absent
7. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
8. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
9. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
10. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power