119
Analysis: State of the Art, J. P. Klein and P. K. Goel (Eds.), 355-368. Kluwer
Academic, Dordrecht, 1992.
[38] A. B. Troxel, G. Ma, and D. F. Heitjan. An index of local sensitivity to nonig-
norability. Statistica Sinica, 14:1221-1237, 2004.
[39] W. Y. Tsai and J. Crowley. A large sample study of the generalized maximum
likelihood estimators from incomplete data via self-consistency. The Annals of
Statistics, 13:1317-1334, 1985.
[40] A. Tsiatis. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A., 72:20-22, 1975.
[41] T. Wagner. Insurance rating bureaus. Journal of Insurance Regulation,
Winter: 189-202, 2000.
[42] C. Q. Wu, L. C. Zhao, and Y. H. Wu. Estimation in change-point hazard function
models. Statistics &; Probability Letters, 63:41-48, 2003.
[43] T. Yeager. Impact of the gramm-leach-bliley act.
http://dailyheadlines, uark. edu/9957. htm, 2007.
[44] A. Zellner. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression and
tests of aggregation bias. Journal of American Statistical Association, 57:348-
368, 1962.
More intriguing information
1. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers2. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
6. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
7. The name is absent
8. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
9. The name is absent
10. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models