119
Analysis: State of the Art, J. P. Klein and P. K. Goel (Eds.), 355-368. Kluwer
Academic, Dordrecht, 1992.
[38] A. B. Troxel, G. Ma, and D. F. Heitjan. An index of local sensitivity to nonig-
norability. Statistica Sinica, 14:1221-1237, 2004.
[39] W. Y. Tsai and J. Crowley. A large sample study of the generalized maximum
likelihood estimators from incomplete data via self-consistency. The Annals of
Statistics, 13:1317-1334, 1985.
[40] A. Tsiatis. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Pro-
ceedings of the National Academy of Science, U.S.A., 72:20-22, 1975.
[41] T. Wagner. Insurance rating bureaus. Journal of Insurance Regulation,
Winter: 189-202, 2000.
[42] C. Q. Wu, L. C. Zhao, and Y. H. Wu. Estimation in change-point hazard function
models. Statistics &; Probability Letters, 63:41-48, 2003.
[43] T. Yeager. Impact of the gramm-leach-bliley act.
http://dailyheadlines, uark. edu/9957. htm, 2007.
[44] A. Zellner. An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regression and
tests of aggregation bias. Journal of American Statistical Association, 57:348-
368, 1962.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
3. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
4. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s
5. European Integration: Some stylised facts
6. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
7. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
8. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
9. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
10. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience