The name is absent



85


Rm ≈ 274 MΩ

Rc ≈ 931 MΩ

Network Conductance (nS)

Pair # Direction 1 Direction 2 Mean

1

1.50

1.40

1.45

2

1.42

1.41

1.41

3

1.54

1.47

1.51

4

0.66

0.62

0.64

5

0.82

0.85

0.83

6

0.56

0.54

0.55

7

1.05

0.94

0.99

8

0.74

0.74

0.74

9

0.51

0.53

0.52

10

1.48

1.53

1.50

11

2.42

■ —

2.42

12

1.90

1.90

13

0.92

0.85

0.89

Grand mean x

= 1.12

Grand sum of squares Tss = 3∙12

Sum of squares between pairs Bss = 3.11
Sum of squares error
Ess = 0.02

Table 5.2 : Network conductance values for adjacent rods from initial data, with results of
ANOVA analysis given at the bottom. Single measurements (11 and 12) are excluded from
ANOVA. The sum of squares error is small in comparison to the total sum of squares, indi-
cating that there is good agreement in measurements made in either direction. The mean
x= 1.12 nS = 0.89 GΩ.

5.4 Cable Theory

Now that we have an estimate of the coupling resistance and membrane resistance between
cells, it makes sense to use them to explain how these values will affect the representation of



More intriguing information

1. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
2. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION
8. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
9. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
10. The name is absent