The name is absent



85


Rm ≈ 274 MΩ

Rc ≈ 931 MΩ

Network Conductance (nS)

Pair # Direction 1 Direction 2 Mean

1

1.50

1.40

1.45

2

1.42

1.41

1.41

3

1.54

1.47

1.51

4

0.66

0.62

0.64

5

0.82

0.85

0.83

6

0.56

0.54

0.55

7

1.05

0.94

0.99

8

0.74

0.74

0.74

9

0.51

0.53

0.52

10

1.48

1.53

1.50

11

2.42

■ —

2.42

12

1.90

1.90

13

0.92

0.85

0.89

Grand mean x

= 1.12

Grand sum of squares Tss = 3∙12

Sum of squares between pairs Bss = 3.11
Sum of squares error
Ess = 0.02

Table 5.2 : Network conductance values for adjacent rods from initial data, with results of
ANOVA analysis given at the bottom. Single measurements (11 and 12) are excluded from
ANOVA. The sum of squares error is small in comparison to the total sum of squares, indi-
cating that there is good agreement in measurements made in either direction. The mean
x= 1.12 nS = 0.89 GΩ.

5.4 Cable Theory

Now that we have an estimate of the coupling resistance and membrane resistance between
cells, it makes sense to use them to explain how these values will affect the representation of



More intriguing information

1. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
2. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
3. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
4. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
5. The name is absent
6. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
7. Should informal sector be subsidised?
8. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
9. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
10. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art