85
Rm ≈ 274 MΩ
Rc ≈ 931 MΩ
Network Conductance (nS)
Pair # Direction 1 Direction 2 Mean
|
1 |
1.50 |
1.40 |
1.45 |
|
2 |
1.42 |
1.41 |
1.41 |
|
3 |
1.54 |
1.47 |
1.51 |
|
4 |
0.66 |
0.62 |
0.64 |
|
5 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
|
6 |
0.56 |
0.54 |
0.55 |
|
7 |
1.05 |
0.94 |
0.99 |
|
8 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
|
9 |
0.51 |
0.53 |
0.52 |
|
10 |
1.48 |
1.53 |
1.50 |
|
11 |
2.42 |
■ — |
2.42 |
|
12 |
1.90 |
— |
1.90 |
|
13 |
0.92 |
0.85 |
0.89 |
|
Grand mean x |
= 1.12 |
Grand sum of squares Tss = 3∙12
Sum of squares between pairs Bss = 3.11
Sum of squares error Ess = 0.02
Table 5.2 : Network conductance values for adjacent rods from initial data, with results of
ANOVA analysis given at the bottom. Single measurements (11 and 12) are excluded from
ANOVA. The sum of squares error is small in comparison to the total sum of squares, indi-
cating that there is good agreement in measurements made in either direction. The mean
x= 1.12 nS = 0.89 GΩ.
5.4 Cable Theory
Now that we have an estimate of the coupling resistance and membrane resistance between
cells, it makes sense to use them to explain how these values will affect the representation of
More intriguing information
1. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“2. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
3. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
4. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
5. Une Classe de Concepts
6. The name is absent
7. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
8. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
9. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
10. The name is absent