85
Rm ≈ 274 MΩ
Rc ≈ 931 MΩ
Network Conductance (nS)
Pair # Direction 1 Direction 2 Mean
1 |
1.50 |
1.40 |
1.45 |
2 |
1.42 |
1.41 |
1.41 |
3 |
1.54 |
1.47 |
1.51 |
4 |
0.66 |
0.62 |
0.64 |
5 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
6 |
0.56 |
0.54 |
0.55 |
7 |
1.05 |
0.94 |
0.99 |
8 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
9 |
0.51 |
0.53 |
0.52 |
10 |
1.48 |
1.53 |
1.50 |
11 |
2.42 |
■ — |
2.42 |
12 |
1.90 |
— |
1.90 |
13 |
0.92 |
0.85 |
0.89 |
Grand mean x |
= 1.12 |
Grand sum of squares Tss = 3∙12
Sum of squares between pairs Bss = 3.11
Sum of squares error Ess = 0.02
Table 5.2 : Network conductance values for adjacent rods from initial data, with results of
ANOVA analysis given at the bottom. Single measurements (11 and 12) are excluded from
ANOVA. The sum of squares error is small in comparison to the total sum of squares, indi-
cating that there is good agreement in measurements made in either direction. The mean
x= 1.12 nS = 0.89 GΩ.
5.4 Cable Theory
Now that we have an estimate of the coupling resistance and membrane resistance between
cells, it makes sense to use them to explain how these values will affect the representation of